- #1
Raziel2701
- 128
- 0
Homework Statement
sigh* Well, I have more than a week to do this lab, and usually I don't resort for help here, but on this lab there are so many things I am unsure of.
So here's the setup of the lab:
I have a one Farad capacitor, a DC power supply, a multimeter, a bunch of banana-cables as well as a decade box and a multimeter. I connect them to make an RC circuit with the resistance set at 75ohms in the decade box and the multimeter set to measure the voltage across the capacitor. I charge the capacitor up to 5V, and then disconnect the capacitor from the power supply in order to discharge the capacitor.
Every ten seconds, I measure the voltage recorded on the multimeter. I run the experiment two more times so I have three data sets to analyze. By graphing this data and doing some fitting that I'll explain later, I am to find the time constant and the capacitance and see if it matches the theoretical value.
Homework Equations
V(t)=V_{0}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}
This is the given equation that models the potential difference in the capacitor as it discharges. Notice that RC in the exponent is the time constant, and since I know that the circuit has a resistance of 75 ohms and the capacitor is one Farad, the time constant, as obtained from the experiment, should be somewhere around 75.
The linearization used to supposedly find the time constant was to plot the natural log of the recorded voltages against time. I found this by simply trying to solve for RC from the previous equation and then noticed that the slope of the line would correspond to the inverse of RC. Thus the slope of the line should correspond to \frac{1}{RC}.
The Attempt at a Solution
I've played around with my data, I figured that when t=RC, the voltage in the capacitor must have decreased to 37% of its initial value. My three data sets kind of follow this trend. The data sets present a percentage of 33, 34 and 39.8 percent. I can share this data sets if requested. I can't gather any useful information from this fact, but at least it was refreshing to see something come out as theorized.
I've plotted V versus time and it is an exponentially decaying function. I'm using Graphical Analysis to plot my data, and I've been using the exponential fit to see how well it looks. It looks great. And the constant that Graphical Analysis gives me. Hold on, here is what graphical analysis does with my data under an exponential fit. It tries to make it fit this equation:
A^{-Cx} +B
Where A, C and B are constants and x is my dependent variable. The software gives me a value to all of the constants and I've also used this "C" constant to be equal to the inverse of RC.
I don't know if this last one is true though. I've calculated the time constant through both the linearization of ln(V) vs time, and from the constant given through plotting software. Both answers are off from the mark, but especially so when using the linearization process.
When using this method I obtain values of 219, 119 and 128. When using the constant calculated by the software I get values of 23, 38 and 36. Much closer to 75 but still rather off.
I've yet to reproduce the experiment again. I will this Friday. In the meantime it's penance time for me since I need to come up with a better intuition for this experiment. The instrumentation is accurate and working properly as far as I'm concerned. Errors in measurement seems unlikely since my three data sets have consistent, reproducible values. The capacitor could be leaking charge, but would that account for such obscene discrepancies between the expected and actual results?
The connection to make the RC circuit has been verified by the professor, so I know there's no fault there.
Am I to receive no advice since it looks like I simply need to redo the experiment?
Please excuse any faults in my formatting. I just joined and I have no experience posting in here.
I appreciate any comments.
