Can a Solar System Exist Without a Central Star?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of a solar system existing without a central star, examining the characteristics such a system might have and the gravitational forces that could maintain orbits. Participants consider various celestial objects, such as black holes, pulsars, and large gravitational bodies, as potential central forces in these systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose the idea of a "sunless solar system," suggesting that a large object, such as dark matter or a mini black hole, could serve as the gravitational center.
  • Others mention pulsars as potential central objects, referencing their discovery in planetary systems.
  • One participant notes that if our sun were to collapse into a black hole, the planets would continue to orbit it but would not receive sunlight, leading to the Earth's demise.
  • It is suggested that any body with a significant gravitational field could maintain smaller objects in orbit, though the nature of that body is debated.
  • Some participants discuss the existence of solar systems with one visible star and an unseen object, which could be a black hole or brown dwarf.
  • A participant questions whether a sufficiently large object would create fission in its center, while another clarifies that fission would not occur if the necessary elements had been depleted.
  • There is a contention regarding the definition of a solar system, with some arguing that a star is a requirement, while others suggest that systems with orbiting bodies around non-stars could exist.
  • One participant suggests that Saturn and its moons could be considered a "sunless solar system," as it is a large object with smaller objects orbiting it.
  • However, it is noted that Saturn itself revolves around the sun, complicating its classification in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a solar system can exist without a star, with some asserting that a star is necessary while others propose alternative configurations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and characteristics of such systems.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions of what constitutes a solar system, and the discussion includes various assumptions about gravitational forces and the nature of celestial bodies involved.

The Grimmus
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Sunless "solar"system

Is there such thing as a sunless solar system maybe not called solar but has all of the charicteristics of one minus the sun.
Possably a huge object being the gravation force or Dark matter or a mini black hole
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Or would a pulsar do? Such things are knwon (and indeed were the first planetary systems discovered in the late late late 80's).
 
I've never heard of a 'sunless solar system'
Although i have read, that if our sun collapsed into a stellar black hole, the planets would continue to orbit around it, but they'd receive no sunlight, and the Earth would die.
Actually in Science last term, there was a question on one of our homework sheets, something like "if the sun followed this process (how stars begin and die, we had to read that) what will happen to the planets? The Earht?"
Well i just wrote that the Earth would die because lack of sunlight, and i got it correct.
 
Its definitely possible for this to happen, all it would take is a body with a large gravitational field (could be anything) to have other smaller objects in orbit.
 
They do exist and have been found. They've seen solar systems with one visible star. The star can be seen to have what is called an acretion disk, surrounding some other object which can't be seen. That unseen object could be anything from a black hole to a brown dwarf.
 
Originally posted by Andy
Its definitely possible for this to happen, all it would take is a body with a large gravitational field (could be anything) to have other smaller objects in orbit.

but if it where to be that big would that creat soem kind of fision at least in the center of the object?
 
No, not if all the elements involved in fission like Hydrogen had run out.

That is how a black hole forms in the first place.
(It was basically just a REALLY big star that ran out of fuel and so couldn't generate the pressure neede to hold itself together and so ended up collapsing in on itself) The gravity would still be there, just no reaction.
 
Originally posted by Draco
I've never heard of a 'sunless solar system'
Although i have read, that if our sun collapsed into a stellar black hole, the planets would continue to orbit around it, but they'd receive no sunlight, and the Earth would die.
Actually in Science last term, there was a question on one of our homework sheets, something like "if the sun followed this process (how stars begin and die, we had to read that) what will happen to the planets? The Earht?"
Well i just wrote that the Earth would die because lack of sunlight, and i got it correct.
Hmm... I would have thought that mercury would undergo spaghetification due to the extreme tidal forces.
 
It would seem that, by definition, a solar system requires a star. But certainly other systems consisting of stuff orbiting a non-star exist (just don't expect 9 planets, an asteroid belt, etc.)

"all the characteristics of a solar system"...I don't think there's a standard one-size fits all definition (other than the requirement of the star)
 
  • #10
well i meant having planents and other objects orbiting it and follows the orbit of a galaxy not another object
 
  • #11
so surely then saturn and its mooms could be classed as one of these systems.

it is a large object with smaller objects orbiting it. and it is not a star
 
  • #12
but it relvolves around the sun which revolves around the center of our galaxy if saturn where to revolve around are galaxies nucules then yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K