Perturbation Theory: Finite Sums & Physics Applications

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interactions String
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Perturbation theory is effective when contributions decrease progressively with higher orders, allowing accurate results from the first few diagrams. The discussion asserts that a perturbation series cannot oscillate between increasing and decreasing values without negative terms, which would negate the possibility of a finite sum. It emphasizes that the coupling constant must remain relatively small, akin to the conditions for Taylor series calculations, to validate the use of expansions. The proposed alternating expansion is deemed ineffective as it leads to cancellation of effects per order.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of coupling constants in physics
  • Basic concepts of finite sums and series convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of coupling constants in quantum field theory
  • Study the mathematical foundations of Taylor series and their applications
  • Explore the limitations of perturbation theory in various physical contexts
  • Investigate alternative methods to perturbation theory for complex systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those working in quantum mechanics and field theory, as well as students and researchers interested in advanced mathematical techniques in physics.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Perturbation theory provides good answers as long as the contributions get smaller and smaller as we go to higher and higher orders. Then we only need to compute the first few diagrams to get accurate results.
Is it possible for a perturbation series to get bigger then smaller then bigger-it wouldn't have a finite sum unless some terms were negative, but could such a perturbation expansion be useful in physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A perturbation theory as you envision it cannot come from expansions in coupling-constants. So my answer is no.

Remember that the contributions will always get smaller and smaller in higher orders, this is exactly what the expanion is about.

The criterium for deciding whether one can or cannot use expanions is the fact that the coupling constant must be relativly small, just like the conditions needed for calculation a Taylor-series...


The way you suggest a finit theory through an alternating expansion is useless because the effects per order would cancel out each other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K