Thread Closed

Singularity and Anti singularity

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr22-10, 03:21 AM   #1
 

Singularity and Anti singularity


What would happen if a singularity collapsed from normal matter collided with one collapsed from antimatter? Or if the collapse into a singularity negated the line between anti/normal matter, what would happen if a stellar sized mass of antimatter collided with a black hole?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
Apr22-10, 06:59 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
You'd get a larger black hole. Matter and Anti-matter are all the same in terms of mass and gravitational effect.
 
Apr22-10, 06:36 PM   #3
qwe
 
i believe he meant to pose this question: what if particles with negative mass can exist in nature, and what if a black singularity of such particles collides with a normal singularity?

of course, you can't have a singularity/black hole of particles that want to get away from eachother. it's the opposite of gravity. so that question is moot as well
 
Apr22-10, 08:12 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Singularity and Anti singularity


Quote by qwe View Post
i believe he meant to pose this question: what if particles with negative mass can exist in nature, and what if a black singularity of such particles collides with a normal singularity?
I don't think so. He asked about antimatter, which is not matter with a negative mass.
 
Apr22-10, 08:35 PM   #5
 
Quote by qwe View Post
i believe he meant to pose this question: what if particles with negative mass can exist in nature, and what if a black singularity of such particles collides with a normal singularity?

of course, you can't have a singularity/black hole of particles that want to get away from eachother. it's the opposite of gravity. so that question is moot as well
1.) What is a "Black Singularity"?
2.) His question was pretty clear... where did you read this?
3.) "partcles" don't collide with a singularity, or maybe they do... after the event horizon there is no predictive theory... so... huh?
4.) A BH is not "particles"... it isn't matter.. it's a region of spacetime defined by mass, charge, and spin. PERIOD.
 
Apr23-10, 12:48 AM   #6
 
If you make the assumption that the state of matter was constant (which it cannot be) then you could expect the same result from a "normal black hole" and an "anti-black hole" to generate the same kind of explosion that happens when any antimatter meets an equivalent piece of matter.
The problem is that "matter" as it normally exists cannot exist in the proposed temperatures and pressures of a black hole. There simply isn't enough space for electrons, protons and neutrons to exist as separate particals.

This from the layman at 60 years old and more or less ignorant in cosmology and astrophysics.
Paul
 
Apr23-10, 04:26 PM   #7
 
So in other words no charge would exist in the actual singularity, so the merger would work just like 2 normal black holes colliding, not creating a matter/anti-matter explosion?
 
Apr23-10, 06:55 PM   #8
 
Quote by thehindmost View Post
So in other words no charge would exist in the actual singularity, so the merger would work just like 2 normal black holes colliding, not creating a matter/anti-matter explosion?
The BH as a whole can have charge, but I don't know that you can make any inference about the singularity. Meanginful understandings of physics END at the Event Horizon. Two BHs with opposite charge will merge into a single BH... there is nothing to annihilate.
 
Apr28-10, 08:13 PM   #9
 
Quote by Frame Dragger View Post
The BH as a whole can have charge, but I don't know that you can make any inference about the singularity. Meanginful understandings of physics END at the Event Horizon. Two BHs with opposite charge will merge into a single BH... there is nothing to annihilate.
It seems likely that they would annihilate one another to my layman understanding (other than the fact that no one understands the physics inside of a black hole). That said, isn't it kind of irrelevant since the time distortion caused by the incredible speed relative to the observer would make this type of impact take a nearly infinite amount of time relative to us?
 
Apr28-10, 08:31 PM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Whether or not time dilation prevents an outside observer from ever seeing the merger complete, the black holes do still collide, making the details of this collision important in the frame of the black holes. However, as emphasized by others in this post, it makes no sense to speculate on the collision of singularities -- which most probably don't exist. Frame Dragger...why is your name crossed out all of a sudden? Did you kill someone?
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Singularity and Anti singularity
Thread Forum Replies
How can we be sure of a singularity? Cosmology 11
Singularity Astrophysics 2
singularity Linear & Abstract Algebra 11