Escape velocity outside event horizon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of escape velocity in the context of black holes, particularly focusing on the behavior of light and objects near the event horizon. Participants explore theoretical implications, definitions, and the effects of gravity on time dilation, with references to general relativity and classical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that escape velocity at the event horizon is infinite, while others argue it is equal to the speed of light (C).
  • There is a discussion about the implications of escape velocity being greater than the speed of light, with some stating that nothing can escape if the escape velocity exceeds C.
  • One participant suggests that an object fired from the event horizon would follow a parabolic path back to it, while another counters that this scenario is physically impossible due to infinite time dilation at the horizon.
  • Time dilation is debated, with some participants noting that it is only infinite for distant observers, while those near the horizon experience different effects.
  • There is a distinction made between the perception of time and motion for observers at different distances from the black hole, particularly regarding how an observer in orbit perceives events compared to a distant observer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the definitions and implications of escape velocity and event horizons, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of escape velocity, the effects of time dilation depending on the observer's position, and the complexities of general relativity versus classical physics perspectives.

Ray Eston Smith Jr
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Escape velocity at particular radius from the gravitational source means the initial speed that an object needs at that raduis in order to coast without limit ("to infinity") without ever falling back to the gravitational source. If the escape velocity at a radius is so large that nothing inside that radius can ever move outside that radius, then the escape velocity at that radius is infinite.

Suppose that a light beam is directed radially outward from a source in the vicinity of a black hole event horizon.

If the light source is exactly on the event horizon, then the beam will become infinitely red-shifted in zero distance. In other words, it won't go anywhere. This is because escape velocity at the event horizon is infinite.

If the light source is a short distance outside the event horizon, then the beam will travel a short distance before it becomes infinitely red-shifted. This is because the escape velocity at that radius is finite but much larger than the speed of light, so that light cannot escape to infinity.

At some distance from the event horizon, the escape velocity will be equal to the speed of light. By definition, this is the Schwarzschild radius. By LaPlace's classical physics derivation, this distance would be 2GM/c-squared. When the light source is at that radius, the beam will travel forever without becoming infinitely red-shifted. If the light source was just inside that radius, the beam would travel a very long, but finite, distance before it became infiinitely red-shifted.

Thus the event horizon is not located at a spatial distance of 2GM/c-squared from the center of mass. It is separated from the center of mass by zero spatial distance and by a time interval of 2GM/c-squared. The center of mass is empty space with null gravity until, after a time interval of 2GM/c-squared (in the free-fall reference frame at the center point), the singularity arrives with all the mass-energy within the spatial Schwarzschild radius falling in on the spatial center point. (That last sentence makes no sense, but it's as close as I can come to visualizing something that happens nowhere after forever.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ray Eston Smith Jr said:
Escape velocity at particular radius from the gravitational source means the initial speed that an object needs at that raduis in order to coast without limit ("to infinity") without ever falling back to the gravitational source. If the escape velocity at a radius is so large that nothing inside that radius can ever move outside that radius, then the escape velocity at that radius is infinite.
Not quite. Since there is an ultimate speed limit in the universe (the speed of light), as long as the escape velocity is above that speed, nothing can ever escape.
Suppose that a light beam is directed radially outward from a source in the vicinity of a black hole event horizon.

If the light source is exactly on the event horizon, then the beam will become infinitely red-shifted in zero distance. In other words, it won't go anywhere. This is because escape velocity at the event horizon is infinite.
Good until the last sentence: the escape velocity is not infinite at the event horizon, its C.
If the light source is a short distance outside the event horizon, then the beam will travel a short distance before it becomes infinitely red-shifted. This is because the escape velocity at that radius is finite but much larger than the speed of light, so that light cannot escape to infinity.
No, that's not what an event horizon is. The event horizon is the distance at which the escape velocity is C.
 
"Not quite. Since there is an ultimate speed limit in the universe (the speed of light), as long as the escape velocity is above that speed, nothing can ever escape. "

No, you're misunderstanding the meaning of "escape velocity."

When the escape velocity is above the speed of light, nothing can coast to infinity. That's what escape velocity means - the speed needed to coast outward forever without the ever-decreasing pull of gravity ever taking away all of the object's energy (kinetic energy for moving mass, or the energy associated with frequency for a light beam). At a point where the escape velocity equaled the speed of light, the frequency of the outgoing light beam would approach zero as its distance approached infinity.
 
Are you proposing a new definition of "event horizon"?

It sounds like what you are saying is that an object fired outward from the event horizon at any speed would take a parabolic path back to the event horizon and a beam of light fired from the event horizon would be infinitely red-shifted as its distance went to infinity. Since both the object and the light can go out past the event horizon, that isn't the "real" event horizon.

Trouble is - neither of those to cases are physically possible. Since on the event horizon, time dilation is infinite, you couldn't fire anything - a beam of light or an object - away from it.
 
Time dilation is only infinite at the horizon for far away observers. For someone actually close to the horizon, and say in orbit, time would not be dilated. This works a little like the speed-related dilations in SR; you may see someone else's coordinates dilated because of their speed relative to you, but they in their rest frame experience no dilation. Here instead of the speed, it's position in the BH gravity field (or spacetime curvature) that makes the difference. GR is even more about changes of coordinates than SR.
 
Ray Eston Smith Jr said:
No, you're misunderstanding the meaning of "escape velocity."

When the escape velocity is above the speed of light, nothing can coast to infinity.

I see what you're getting at here. Some people believe that an object has to reach the escape velocity of the Earth in order to escape from the earth. You correctly point out that this is wrong, an object can ascend as slowly as it likes. In Newton's universe what you say makes sense. However relativity changes things. A light beam can't struggle upwards from the black hole and finally fall back, either it escapes or it goes nowhere.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Time dilation is only infinite at the horizon for far away observers. For someone actually close to the horizon, and say in orbit, time would not be dilated.
Right but what does that mean for the person in orbit of the black hole just outside the event horizon? The entire lifespan of the universe would flash by in an instant, wouldn't it? If he fires a gun directly away from black hole, to an outside observer, the bullet doesn't go anywhere. Heck, to an outside observer, he's sitting motionless at the event horizon, isn't he?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K