Simple ising model: Magnetic susceptibility derivation

randomwalk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on a question about deriving an expression for the magnetic susceptibility in terms of the variance of the magnetisation for a simple 2d square ising model.

I get the derivation of the specific heat, and I know am supposed to do something similar to get to the expression for susceptibility d<M>/dH. But how? Any help would be much appreciated.

wuqa1t.png


[beta is 1/KT]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, take a look at the partition function for the Ising Model and what the average of some quantity A is:

Z = \sum_{\{S_i\}}\exp\left[K\sum_{&lt;i,j&gt;}S_iS_j + \beta H \sum_i S_i \right]

\langle A \rangle = Z^{-1}\ \sum_{\{S_i\}}A\exp\left[K\sum_{&lt;i,j&gt;}S_iS_j + \beta H \sum_i S_i \right]

Let the magnetization be M = \sum_i S_i . Note that if you take a derivative of Z with respect to H it brings down the sum over the S_i, so you get the average of M times Z. If you take two derivatives you get the average of M^2 times Z (up to some betas). Compare to the derivative of the average of M with respect to H to get the relation your source claims.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top