Register to reply

Definition of The Biological Sexes

by darkchild
Tags: biological sex, definition, sex
Share this thread:
darkchild
#1
May15-10, 12:34 AM
P: 150
What are the formal biological definitions of male and female? Are they different for humans than for other animals? Does the medical field use different definitions than the biological community?
Phys.Org News Partner Biology news on Phys.org
Sea star disease strikes peninsula marine centers
How sweet it is: New tool for characterizing plant sugar transporters
The right amount of grazing builds diverse forest ecosystems
Moonbear
#2
May19-10, 07:34 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,271
The biological definition of the two sexes is that males are the organisms that produce the mobile gametes, while females produce the non-mobile gametes. The same definition can then be applied to any organism with two distinct gametes, not just animals. Even in plants, the male plant (or male part of the plant) produces the pollen that is mobile (sometimes because of a carrier) that gets transferred to the female plant (or female part of the plant).

The medical field defines the two sexes the same way, but then also uses the terms male and female to refer to gender, which is not the same as sex. Gender is more of a psychosocial construct. So, for example, someone who is biologically of the male sex may have an operation, take hormones, or wear clothing to take on the outward physical characteristics of a female, and may wish to be referred to as female gendered.
darkchild
#3
May19-10, 08:03 PM
P: 150
Quote Quote by Moonbear View Post
The biological definition of the two sexes is that males are the organisms that produce the mobile gametes, while females produce the non-mobile gametes.
That's what I thought, thanks...although I thought gender was a concept only employed in sociology, psychology, anthropology, etc.

Moonbear
#4
May19-10, 08:50 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,271
Definition of The Biological Sexes

Quote Quote by darkchild View Post
That's what I thought, thanks...although I thought gender was a concept only employed in sociology, psychology, anthropology, etc.
The "etc." is the important part. Medicine does involve a good deal of sociology and psychology.
leroyjenkens
#5
May20-10, 09:55 AM
P: 536
The biological definition of the two sexes is that males are the organisms that produce the mobile gametes, while females produce the non-mobile gametes.
So there's no females of any species whose eggs find the sperm? If they did, would they be considered males, even though they produced eggs?
zomgwtf
#6
May20-10, 10:15 AM
P: 500
Quote Quote by leroyjenkens View Post
So there's no females of any species whose eggs find the sperm? If they did, would they be considered males, even though they produced eggs?
Can you think of any? They don't not exist... AFAIK. Female gametes are non-motile and they contain mostly nutrients responsible for the development of the organism once the ovas been fertilized by a male gamete. However the act of fertilization happens in numerous ways this basic rule is always the same. (Ie. in fish they deposit the ova and they will be fertilized outside of the body)
Moonbear
#7
May24-10, 09:43 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,271
Quote Quote by leroyjenkens View Post
So there's no females of any species whose eggs find the sperm? If they did, would they be considered males, even though they produced eggs?
If they were the mobile gamete, they wouldn't be called an egg, they'd be called the sperm. Sperm are the mobile gamete with the flagella that help them swim over to the egg.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Correlation between the sexes General Discussion 31
Cancer and the sexes Biology 4
Task on MTV Battle of the Sexes : Obstacle course atop moving trucks General Physics 1
Why is 2 sexes so common in nature? Biology 35
Logic: the battle of the sexes Biology 7