Spaceship accelerating inside a Black Hole

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a spaceship accelerating inside a black hole, particularly in relation to the singularity and event horizon. Participants explore concepts of time dilation, the nature of singularities, and the implications of acceleration within a black hole's gravitational field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an observer at the event horizon perceives all movement as directed toward the singularity, raising questions about whether a spaceship accelerating away from the singularity would still be drawn toward it.
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether objects inside a black hole can ever reach the center, with some suggesting that time dilation implies they would never arrive, while others argue that finite time could be experienced from the infalling object's perspective.
  • Participants discuss the definition of a singularity, with some asserting it refers strictly to a point of infinite density, while others suggest alternative interpretations, such as the possibility of a minimum size for a collapsing star.
  • One participant challenges the notion of singularities, suggesting that current scientific consensus may not support their existence within black holes.
  • There are claims that no object can accelerate in the direction opposite to the singularity, and that any acceleration would only hasten the arrival at the singularity.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that gravitational effects near the event horizon mimic those of a point singularity, leading to a discussion about the experience of free-falling objects versus the mass that forms the singularity.
  • A later reply introduces the idea that centrifugal force behaves differently within the event horizon, complicating the dynamics of motion near the black hole's center.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of singularities, the experience of objects falling into black holes, and the implications of acceleration within this context. The discussion remains unresolved with no clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of singularity, the unresolved nature of quantum gravity theories, and the complexities of time dilation effects as they relate to the experience of infalling objects.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Seen in another thread:
LURCH said:
5)More revealing to say that the observer at the EH will see all movement forward in time as movement toward the center. From the EH on inward, all timelines (all futures) progress toward the center.
Does this implies that a spaceship, inside a black hole, accelerating in the direction OPPOSITE to the singularity would actually accelerate TOWARDS the singularity? Or does it simply mean that no matter how fast a speed he reaches through his acceleration, he would never get to a speed fast enough to stop his falling towards the center?

Also, is it true that an object inside a black hole will never quite reach the center? That would make a lot of sense for a black hole consisting of an infinitely dense star. However, I think some (most?) people on this forum would tend to believe the star doesn't collapse infinitely on itself but rather has a minimum size (something I would intuitively tend to believe too). In this scenario, it would seem that matter falling in a black hole would be able to reach the center after some time. Correct?

Lastly, if the center of the BH is NOT an infinitely dense star but rather has some definite volume, would it still be called a 'singularity' or is the word stritcly reserved for points at which the curvature of space-time is infinite?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strange

I thought that black holes were a type of worm hole with no real center just a long tube.
 
The term "singularity" is indeed reserved for a mass with no dimensions, occupying a single point.

I am one of those who do not believe BH's have a singularity at the center, and your statement about time-dilation making it take forever to reach the center is precisely the reason why. If time dilation makes the final moment of infall take forever, then this also applies the final moment of collapse for the original mass. So theoretically, niether the original mass nor any infalling object would ever reach the center.
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression that pretty much no scientists though there was a singularity in a black hole anymore? I thought the only possible singularity anyone talked about seriously now was pre-big bang? But maybe I'm wrong.
 
LURCH said:
The term "singularity" is indeed reserved for a mass with no dimensions, occupying a single point.
Since when? An infinite 2-dimensional line of mass-energy (e.g. a beam of light with no width) has a 2d-singularity. It doesn't even have an event horizon. I guess that's called a naked singularity.

Does this implies that a spaceship, inside a black hole, accelerating in the direction OPPOSITE to the singularity would actually accelerate TOWARDS the singularity?
Nothing can accelerate in the direction opposite to the singularity.

And I don't believe that anything can reach the singularity since it would take an infinite amount of time to do so. I think the distance from a point outside the BH to the singularity is infinite - Don't quote me though since I'm not really into black holes.

Pete
 
quasar987 said:
Does this implies that a spaceship, inside a black hole, accelerating in the direction OPPOSITE to the singularity would actually accelerate TOWARDS the singularity? Or does it simply mean that no matter how fast a speed he reaches through his acceleration, he would never get to a speed fast enough to stop his falling towards the center?

Acceleration, in whatever direction, will only mean that it reaches the singularity sooner. The way to survive longest is to stay in free fall. I'm not sure that is makes sense to talk of accelerating in the direction OPPOSITE to the singularity as this direction is now timelike - how do you accelerate backwards in time? :confused:

quasar987 said:
Also, is it true that an object inside a black hole will never quite reach the center? That would make a lot of sense for a black hole consisting of an infinitely dense star.
Using Schwarzschild coordinates (the coordinate system of an outside observer) an object takes an infinite amount of time to reach the event horizon and even longer:rolleyes: to reach the singularity. However from the point of view of the infalling obect it crosses the event horizon and reaches the singularity within a finite (and for typical black holes, fairly short) time.
quasar987 said:
However, I think some (most?) people on this forum would tend to believe the star doesn't collapse infinitely on itself but rather has a minimum size (something I would intuitively tend to believe too).
Quantum theory suggests that there is some limit to how small the collapsing star can become. However we don't have a quantum theory of gravity yet so its hard to know. My guess is that black holes will turn out not to exist (see www.chronon.org/articles/blackholes.html)
gonzo said:
I was under the impression that pretty much no scientists though there was a singularity in a black hole anymore? I thought the only possible singularity anyone talked about seriously now was pre-big bang? But maybe I'm wrong.
I would think that full quantum gravity would also eliminate the big-bang singularity
 
Although no mass reaches the center in finite time, the gravitational effects of the mass, as seen from outside the event horizon, are indistinguishable from the gravitational effects of a point singularity. If you could magically teleport to the center of a black hole, without waiting forever to get there, you would see empty space and null gravity. But, without magic, there's no way to reach the center of mass ahead of the mass that's already gotten "sufficiently close" to the event horizon.
If you free-fall to the center, you get there in finite time in your worldline, but the mass needed to form the actual singularity gets there ahead of you (or at the same time, at the end of time).
 
As an interesting sidenote:

I have even seen an article explaining how, within the event Horizon, even centrifugal force works in reverse. A traveler attempting to keep his distance from the center of black hole by accelerating laterally and trying to "orbit" the center will find that, the faster he orbits, the more force he generates toward the center! I found this completely mind blowing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
3K