Can you prove the combinatorics equation nC(k-1) + nCk = (n+1)Ck for k > 0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the combinatorial identity nC(k-1) + nCk = (n+1)Ck for k > 0. Participants explore various methods of proof, including algebraic manipulation and combinatorial reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving the identity and considers using induction, noting that direct application of the binomial coefficient formula becomes messy.
  • Another participant suggests expanding the left-hand side of the equation and simplifying it to demonstrate the identity, providing a specific algebraic manipulation.
  • A third participant provides a detailed proof using the definition of the binomial coefficient, explaining the steps to arrive at the identity and offering a verbal interpretation of the combinatorial reasoning behind it.
  • One participant appreciates the clarity and elegance of the proof provided by another, indicating a positive reception of the explanations shared.
  • A different perspective is introduced, where a participant describes the problem in terms of set theory, explaining how adding an item to a set leads to the same combinatorial identity through different choices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to the problem, with no consensus on a single method being the best. The discussion includes various interpretations and proofs, indicating that multiple views remain on how to effectively demonstrate the identity.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that their approaches may not fully prove the identity but rather illustrate its validity under certain conditions or for specific cases. There is also mention of the complexity involved in using the binomial coefficient formula directly.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

In my calculus book, this problem has been pestering me"

Prove nC(k-1) + nCk = (n+1)Ck, where k > 0 which is read " n choose k-1" + "n choose k"

= n+1C k.

I tried using the formula for the binomial coefficient, but it becomes very messy. I also tried setting k = 1, but then it did not seem like I was actually proving it. Rather I was showing that the statement holds for k > 0. Would I have to use proof my induction? I know that n! = n(n-1)!. Any replies would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just expand the left hand side of the given formula and take out (n+1)!/[k!(n+1-k)!], then you will be left with [k/(n+1)]+[(n-k+1)/(n+1)] which is equal to 1.

You're welcome! --lol--
 
Hello courtigrad.

To prove it, just remember the definition of C,

[tex]C_{k-1}^{n} + C_{k}^{n}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac {n!} {(k-1)!(n-k+1)!} + \frac {n!}{k!(n-k)!}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac {n!k} {k!(n-k+1)!} + \frac {n!(n-k+1)}{k!(n-k+1)!}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac {n!}{k!(n+1-k)!} (k+n-k+1)[/tex]
[tex]= C_{k}^{n+1}[/tex]

The equation has a verbal interpretation. To choose k things from n+1 things, we can first take away one thing (call it x) from the n+1 things, leaving n things. Then we may either make x one of our k things to be choosen (and in this case we choose k-1 things from the remaining n things), or exclude x as our choice (and in this case we choose all the k things from the remaining n things).
 
Thanks a lot guys! That was of great help. Wong I really appreciate how much time you spent writing your solution. It is very elegant!
 
FWIW - here's another take on the problem: Suppose a set S contains n items. You add one additional item to form a new set S' (containing n+1 items). Now in choosing k items from S' you could choose them all from the original n items in S, C(n, k), or you could choose the item you just added plus k-1 items from the original items, C(n, k-1) so that C(n+1, k) = C(n, k) + C(n, k-1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K