Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction between the slide and the child

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction between a child sliding down an inclined slide. The incline is specified at 28°, and the child's speed at the bottom is noted to be half of what it would be on a frictionless slide.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using equations of motion and energy conservation principles to relate forces and speeds. There is mention of calculating work done by friction and applying the theorem of variation of kinetic energy. Some participants express confusion regarding the application of distance in the context of friction.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem and various approaches being explored. Some participants have attempted to derive the coefficient of friction using different angles and speed ratios, while others are questioning the correctness of their methods and results. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of energy conservation and the relationship between speed and friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in angles and speed ratios, which may affect their calculations. There is also mention of a due date for the assignment and an answer key that provides a specific answer without explanation.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
A child slides down a slide with a 28° incline, and at the bottom her speed is precisely one half what it would have been if the slide had been frictionless. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction between the slide and the child.

here's the two equations I used:

sin28*m*g=m(v2/t) since v2=v1+at

the other one is with friction:

sin28*m*g-u*cos28*m*g=m((1/2*v2)/t)

but when I solve for u i am not getting the correct answer...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate the work done by friction (coefficient times distance traveled) then apply energy conservation to both situations.
 
:confused: Ok, so I used the same equations as the first post. But I don't know what Tide means by using the coefficient*distance (we have no distance).

I'm totally lost now
 
Use what Tide said (namely to apply the theorem of variation of KE),but with the correct (i'm sure it was a typo) expression for the friction force.

Answer:[tex]\mu=\frac{1}{2}\tan 28[/tex]°

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Use what Tide said (namely to apply the theorem of variation of KE),but with the correct (i'm sure it was a typo) expression for the friction force.

Answer:[tex]\mu=\frac{1}{2}\tan 28[/tex]°

Daniel.

I have no clue how you figured out the u=(.5)tan28 I usually don't waste a submission on an answer that I don't understand how to get to, but I tried your formula, and it still said I was wrong. In my problem the incline is 26degrees and the speed is 1/4 instead of 1/2. So obviously, I substituted my values, but its not working.

I thought maybe you were solving for u using the 2 equations in the first post, but there are 3 variables (Vf, a, and t), but only 2 equations. This is driving me nuts! :cry:
 
Okay.For your numbers:In the first case (no friction),the theorem reads:

[tex]m\frac{v^{2}}{2}=mgl\sin 26[/tex]°--------->[tex]v=\sqrt{2gl\sin 26}[/tex](*)

For the second case:

[tex]m\frac{v^{2}'}{2}=-\mu mgl\cos 26+mgl\sin 26[/tex](**)

Now the ratio is 1/4,which means:

[tex]\frac{v^{2}'}{v^{2}}=\frac{1}{16}[/tex] (***)

Combine the 3 relations marked with stars to find the final correct answer.

Daniel.

EDIT:Final answer:[tex]\mu=\frac{7}{8}\tan 26[/tex]°
 
Last edited:
ok, well now it makes sense how you got to that...but the damn thing is still telling me that 0.427 answer is wrong. Wow, what a pain in the...
 
That's simply weird.I'm sure that's the ways to do it and the signs for the gravity rok and the friction force work are the ones I've chosen.

Daniel.
 
well, the assignment is past due...the answer key says that the correct answer was 0.457. And of course, there is no explanation about how they got that answer. :mad:
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K