Simplifying Radicals: Solving -125m⁻⁴n⁵ Cube Root

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the cube root of the expression -125m⁻⁴n⁵. Participants are exploring the correct simplification methods and addressing potential misunderstandings in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to simplify the expression while maintaining the radical form. Some express confusion over the correctness of their simplifications and question the necessity of having radicals in the denominator.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the simplification process being discussed. Some participants have provided guidance on how to handle radicals in the denominator, while others emphasize that different forms of the answer can be considered correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that requirements for simplifying radicals may vary by educational program, leading to differing opinions on the appropriateness of certain simplifications.

uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I am sorry for wasting your time with elementary mathematics but I can not complete my homework.

(excuse the clutter, for I do not know how to use Latex)

cube root ( -125 m^-4 n^5 )
I fully simplify this to:
-5n/m * cube root (n^2 / m )

The answer is incorrect, wtf am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not feel that you are wasting our time: all of us choose to visit this forum and answer questions.

I'm not sure how they want you to simplify this, but remember the following:
[tex]\sqrt[x]{y^{z}}=y^{\frac{z}{x}}[/tex]
 
Yes, I know that, but we are to simplify them while still having the radical, but my answer is somehow wrong.
The correct answer is:
-5n/m^2 * cube root(m^2 n^2)
I can not figure out how thay came to that answer.
 
There are multiple correct answers here. In my opinion, if you simplify by giving m and n exponents in the form of fractions, you can't simplify much more. Both this answer and the one you gave above are correct; just different.
 
:smile:
Thank you. I was a nervous wreck thinking I had missed something in class, or could not understand the question.
 
If you are ever unsure, just take two numbers and plug them in. For example, n = 1, m = 2 and then make sure you get the same answer before and after you simplify.
 
The problem you're having stems from the fact that you're not supposed to have radicals in the denominator. What you have to do is this to get an acceptible answer:

[tex]\frac{-5n}{m}\sqrt[3]{\frac{n^2} {m}}[/tex]

Now, multiply the whole problem by 1--in disguise though:

[tex](\frac{m}{m})\frac{-5n}{m}\sqrt[3]{\frac{n^2} {m}}[/tex]

remember, m divided by m is 1.

Now, move the m in the numerator into the radical by saying: [itex]m=\sqrt[3]{m^3}[/itex]

Thus you have:
[tex]\frac{-5n}{m^2}\sqrt[3]{m^3\frac{n^2} {m}}[/tex]

and of course the m in the denominator of the radical cancels oy leaving you with the correct answer.

[tex]\frac{-5n}{m^2}\sqrt[3]{m^2n^2}[/tex]

This is what you're "supposed" to do when you have a radical in the denominator. Will you do this all the time? No. One example of not bothering to do this is [itex]\cos 45^\circ=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]

You'll see these trig values written with the radical in the denominator quite often because the radical can be cancel later on or the required answer will be a decimal approximation.

Hope this helped.
 
Requirements for radicals in the denominator vary from program to program. In Math 31 IB, we were told not to bother. In other courses, we were not. Ultimately, the answer is correct just in a different form. Nevertheless, faust has answered uranium's question as to how they got to that answer.
 
uranium_235 said:
(excuse the clutter, for I do not know how to use Latex)

It is good to practise LaTeX. Many maths symbols and Greek characters can be written :
[tex]\tau\upsilon\rho\nu\beta\alpha\chi\kappa\sigma\iota\gamma\alpha\nu\delta\epsilon\lambda\iota\mu\iota\nu\alpha\tau\epsilon\tau\eta\epsilon\rho\epsilon\pi\epsilon\alpha\tau\iota\nu\gamma\kappa\epsilon\psi[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
760
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K