General Question about Einstein's Theories.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Theories
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the status of Einstein's theories in contemporary physics, particularly whether they have been replaced or merely expanded upon by newer theories. It touches on concepts from general relativity, quantum mechanics, and cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions which of Einstein's models have been replaced, mentioning the cosmological constant as a potential example.
  • Another participant asserts that general relativity remains the accepted model for gravity, despite its incompatibility with quantum theory in certain contexts, and references the discovery of the universe's accelerating expansion linked to dark energy.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that Einstein's theories have not been replaced but rather incorporated into larger frameworks, such as superstring theory, emphasizing that established theories are typically modified rather than discarded.
  • Another participant agrees that Einstein's theories will likely continue to be relevant in specific applications and highlights the ongoing search for a unified theory bridging quantum mechanics and relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Einstein's theories have been replaced or merely expanded upon, indicating a lack of consensus on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the compatibility of general relativity with quantum mechanics and the implications of dark energy, but do not resolve the complexities or assumptions underlying these discussions.

Glenn
Which, if any, of Einsteins models and theories have been replaced by more advanced or precise ones?

The only thing that comes to mind was Einstein's "greatest blunder", the cosmological constant. But hasn't that even found its was back into the equations?

Thanks,
Glenn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General Relativity is still the accepted model for describing gravity, even though physicists have known for quite a while that GR and quantum theory are incompatable when they both must be used (big bang, black holes).

A few years ago (1998) it was discovered that the universe expansion is accelerating. One current theory (most widely accepted, but still quite tentative) is that it is due to "dark energy" which is associated with the cosmological constant.
 
Einstein's theories haven't been replaced by anything, they've just been incorporated into larger theories. For example, superstring theory is a theory that attempts to merge general relativity with quantum mechanics. It's still the same old theory of relativity, only set in a new framework. I think "replaced" is tricky word in physics. True, there are exceptions- I wouldn't hesitate to say heliocentrism replaced geocentrism, though that falls more under the field of astronomy- even so, to me it seems as if for the most part established theories don't just get thrown out. They're expanded and modified, but rarely are they completely abandoned.
 
I agree! Einstein theorem's will be used within specific applications probably forever. There are some who just need to know and will be in a continuous search for that simple equation and are trying to bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and relativity. One speaks well to particle prediction and not the other. Hence the mirrors or dark matter by Hawkins.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K