Why Don't We Land at the Other End When Jumping on a Train or Subway?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rebeccayippie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why a person does not land at the back of a train or subway car when jumping inside it. Participants explore concepts related to physics, particularly focusing on motion, reference frames, and forces involved during the jump.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that when jumping on a moving train, one does not land at the back because they are moving with the train at the same speed.
  • Others question the role of gravity in this scenario, with some asserting that gravity does not influence why a person lands in the same spot relative to the train's floor.
  • A participant introduces the concept of "inertial frame of reference" as relevant to understanding the situation.
  • It is noted that in the absence of external forces, such as air resistance, a person maintains their motion relative to the train, allowing them to land in the same spot.
  • One participant emphasizes that if the train is accelerating or decelerating, the outcome changes, and the forces within the system become unbalanced.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the evolution of understanding motion, referencing Galileo and Newton's contributions to physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the concepts involved, with some agreeing on the role of inertial frames while others remain uncertain about the implications of gravity and external forces. The discussion does not reach a consensus on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of forces and reference frames are not fully explored, and the discussion does not resolve the complexities of how different forces interact during a jump in a moving train.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly concepts related to motion, reference frames, and the historical development of these ideas.

rebeccayippie
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering, how come when we jump on the train or subway, we don't land all the way at the other end? Is it because of physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, how come you can jump up and down on Earth and not get left behind dangling in space, considering that in some reference frame, the Earth is moving extremely fast!

Zz.
 
When you are on a train, or anything moving for that matter, like a car or bus or airplane, you are ALSO moving with it. When you jump you don't fly to the back because you are moving just as fast as the train is.
 
is there anything to do with gravity and the forces between us and the subway?
 
rebeccayippie said:
is there anything to do with gravity and the forces between us and the subway?

Gravity does not factor into the explanation of the above phenomena you asked about in your first post. Gravity pulls you back to the floor after you jump, but is not involved in the reason why you land in the same place relative to the floor of the train. See Drakith's post above.
 
oh okay, now that i read it again, it makes sense. is it a concept of physics though?
 
rebeccayippie said:
oh okay, now that i read it again, it makes sense. is it a concept of physics though?

It is a concept called "inertial frame of reference".

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
It is a concept called "inertial frame of reference".

Zz.

thanks, do you think you can explain how inertial frame of reference is related to landing on the same spot on the subway?
 
rebeccayippie said:
thanks, do you think you can explain how inertial frame of reference is related to landing on the same spot on the subway?

When you jump up, there is nothing to slow you down.

You and the air are traveling at the same speed as the train, so there's nothing to cause your motion to retard.

Think of Newtons laws of motion:
Every body remains in a state of rest or uniform motion (constant velocity) unless it is acted upon by an external unbalanced force.

In this case, there are no unbalanced force acting on you when you jump to cause you to slow down (no air resistance). The train is a closed system where all forces are balanced. In the trains reference frame, you are at rest (and so is the train). In the Earths reference frame, you are in motion (and so is the train). Regardless of which frame you choose, the forces are all balanced and so without an outside force acting on either body (air resistance or the trains brakes when you jump), you both remain either at rest or in constant motion and so you land in the same spot.

You only slow down when you jump out of a train because the air isn't moving at the same speed as the train and so it resists your motion and causes your speed to slow.
This also applies if you jump when the train is accelerating / decelerating you won't land in the same spot. The forces within the system aren't balanced.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
jarednjames said:
When you jump up, there is nothing to slow you down.

You and the air are traveling at the same speed as the train, so there's nothing to cause your motion to retard.

Think of Newtons laws of motion:


In this case, there are no unbalanced force acting on you when you jump to cause you to slow down (no air resistance). The train is a closed system where all forces are balanced. In the trains reference frame, you are at rest (and so is the train). In the Earths reference frame, you are in motion (and so is the train). Regardless of which frame you choose, the forces are all balanced and so without an outside force acting on either body (air resistance or the trains brakes when you jump), you both remain either at rest or in constant motion and so you land in the same spot.

You only slow down when you jump out of a train because the air isn't moving at the same speed as the train and so it resists your motion and causes your speed to slow.
This also applies if you jump when the train is accelerating / decelerating you won't land in the same spot. The forces within the system aren't balanced.

thank you SO much
 
  • #11
rebeccayippie said:
I'm wondering, how come when we jump on the train or subway, we don't land all the way at the other end? Is it because of physics?

Your question is an interesting one because it shows just what problems people had in accepting the ideas of Galileo, Newton and all the other revolutionary thinkers of their time. They thought that things 'naturally' slow down and that they need to be constantly pushed in order to keep going. If you had a horse and cart as your model and no one had invented ball bearings yet then that would be a reasonable assumption. They even thought. later, that the human frame would not be able to withstand traveling on a railway train!
It was by looking up onto the heavens, seeing how the planets moved and then relating this to what you see down on Earth that Newton's Laws of motion were developed to explain both situations in common.
These new Laws explain pretty much all of the physical situations that we experience in everyday life.

Your hat still blows off if you stand up in an open sports car at speed!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K