Solving Tension Bag Problem: Find T1

  • Thread starter Thread starter ek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bag of cement hanging from three wires, with two wires making angles with the horizontal. The original poster is attempting to find the tension in one of the wires, T1, while considering the system's equilibrium conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss resolving the tension forces into their x and y components and applying static equilibrium conditions. There are attempts to derive equations for T1 and T2 based on these components, with some questioning the algebraic manipulations and the presence of cosine terms in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to resolve the tension equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric identities to simplify expressions, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or outcome yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of static equilibrium and are grappling with the implications of the angles involved in the tension calculations. There is a noted frustration with the complexity introduced by the trigonometric functions in the equations.

ek
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with this problem...

A bag of cement of weight Fg hangs from three wires as shown in the attached diagram. Two of the wires make angles theta1 and theta2 with the horizontal. If the system were in equilibrium, show that the tension in the left hand wire is:

T1 = Fgcostheta2/sin(theta 1 + theta2)

Ok, I get that T3 = Fg. I drew a triangle of all the tension forces but that didn't help. Just seems like an odd type of question.

Any help, clues, or suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • #2.JPG
    #2.JPG
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,159
Physics news on Phys.org
consider the knot where all the wires meet as a particle. resolve all the tensions into their x and y components. the sum of all the x components must equal to zero. so do the y components because of static equilibrium.
 
Ok, so that gives T1sinx1 + T2sinx2 + T3 = 0 (x = >theta)

and

T1cosx1 + T2cosx2 = 0

Nothing wrong so far I hope.

Then, solve the second equation for T2 and substitute in eq1. Then solve for T1. Right?

Maybe my algebra is off, but using this method I'm not coming to the correct answer.
 
upward direction is taken as y-axis ie positive. right direction is taken as x-axis ie positive.
y component :
[tex]T_{1}sin\theta_{1}+T_{2}sin\theta_{2}+(-Fg)=0[/tex]
x component :
[tex]T_{2}cos\theta_{2}+(-T_{1}cos\theta_{1})=0[/tex]
Solve it.
 
There's this stupid cosine floating around. It won't go away. :cry:

T1sinx1 + T1(cosx1)(sinx2)/(cosx2) = Fg

T1 = (Fgcosx2)/(sinx1 + cosx1sinx2)

Why is that cos in the denominator still there?

Or does that denominator somehow become sin (x1+x2)?
 
trig identity needed

ek said:
There's this stupid cosine floating around. It won't go away. :cry:

T1sinx1 + T1(cosx1)(sinx2)/(cosx2) = Fg

T1 = (Fgcosx2)/(sinx1 + cosx1sinx2)
You missed a cosx2, that last line should read:
T1 = (Fgcosx2)/(sinx1cosx2 + cosx1sinx2)

Now apply a common trig identity to simplify the denominator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K