Coefficient of friction problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the coefficient of friction, particularly addressing its application on level surfaces versus inclined planes. Participants explore the relationship between friction, angles, and the conditions under which friction acts, with a focus on understanding the underlying principles and measurements involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why friction exists on a level surface when the angle is zero, suggesting confusion about the relationship between the coefficient of friction and the angle of inclination.
  • Another participant clarifies that the coefficient of friction is measured rather than derived, emphasizing the context of measuring it on an inclined plane and noting that an object on a level surface will not slip without an external force.
  • A third participant explains that the equation for the coefficient of friction applies specifically at the angle of repose, where motion begins, and that different methods are needed for horizontal surfaces.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding static friction on a horizontal surface, where friction adjusts to oppose applied forces until a maximum static friction threshold is reached, at which point motion begins.
  • One participant discusses the concept of the "kink" in the frictional force versus applied force graph, indicating the transition from static to kinetic friction, and notes the mathematical nuances involved in this explanation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation and application of the coefficient of friction, particularly regarding its relevance to level surfaces versus inclined planes. The discussion remains unresolved as participants clarify their positions without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the conditions under which friction acts, the definitions of static and kinetic friction, and the mathematical interpretations of the frictional force graph.

CaptainDave
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If the coefficient of friction is derived by f=un...
and u can be calculated as u=sinx/cosx or tanx;
Then why is there still friction on a level surface where x=0 and tanx also equals 0?

Im a beginner in physics. i just need help understanding :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not exactly clear on what you are asking but it seems that you are talking about two entirely different things. First, the coefficient of friction is not "derived." Rather it measured and it appears you are referring to a particular form of measurement. Namely, you place an object on an inclined plane (the object and plane having the desired composition) and determine the tilt of the plane when the object begins to slop. Obviously, if the object is sitting on a level surface it's not going to slip of its own accord. That all refers to the measurement of the coefficient.

Once you have measured the coefficient then you can use it for doing calculations such as how much work would be done by dragging the object across a level surface!
 
Co-efficient of friction

CaptainDave,

You are right. You can calculate the co-effiecient of friction as

[tex]\mu =\frac{sin x}{cosx}[/tex]

But, this is case in the following situation. You have a block on an incline, and you go on increasing the angle of the incline. The block remains at rest initially. But, a stage comes when the angle of incline is sufficient to make the block move off. This is the angle you must use as x in the above equation. You can't use the angle at just any position.

So in case of a horizontal surface, you need to find other methods.

( weight of box is equal to the normal rection )

spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
To add to what spacetime said...

When you say that

[tex]\mu =\frac{\sin\alpha}{\cos\alpha}[/tex]

you are giving the value of the coefficient at the instant motion is about to begin. This [tex]\alpha[/tex] is called the Angle of Repose. It is the angle at which motion (naturally) begins.

On a horizontal surface, there are two possibilites: no-motion (rest) or motion. If no external force acts on a body and the body is at rest, the friction force is indeed zero. However, as the force on it is increased from zero, the frictional force also increases so as to oppose relative motion of the body with respect to the surface (Friction always opposes relative motion).

The body however remains at rest so long as the applied force is less than the maximum static friction on the horizontal surface ([tex]f_{s,max} = \mu_{s}N[/tex]) since the static friction force in this case being less than fsmax is self-adjusting and makes itself equal to the applied force. At the instant the applied force equals fsmax, motion "just" starts. This can be better explained by the "kink" in the graph of frictional force vs applied force. For subsequent times, friction equals coefficient of Kinetic Friction times the normal reaction. The usage of the word "just" is not correct mathematically but it is conveniently explained by the notion of left and right handed limits if you're interested.

Hope that helps...
Cheers
vivek
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K