| New Reply |
Gamma matrices |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar19-11, 07:15 AM | #1 |
|
|
Gamma matrices
I'm doing a course which assumes knowledge of Group Theory - unfortunately I don't have very much.
Can someone please explain this statement to me (particularly the bits in bold): "there is only one non-trivial irreducible representation of the Cliford algebra, up to conjugacy" FYI The Clifford algebra is just the the relationship between gamma matrices: [tex][\gamma_\mu,\gamma_\nu]=2\eta_{\nu\mu}[/tex] where [..] is the anticommutator rather than the commutator |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Mar19-11, 09:49 AM | #2 |
|
|
The γμ's are initially understood to be abstract objects satisfying the equation you've written. Representation means we assign a matrix to each γμ and interpret the equation as a matrix equation, where the RHS contains the identity matrix I. Conjugacy refers to the fact that for any matrix M, if γμ is a solution then the conjugate set γμ' = M γμ M-1 is also a solution. Irreducible means that the γμ's are not simultaneously block diagonal, nor conjugate to a set that is block diagonal.
Putting that all together, it means that you can write down any set of γ matrices you can think of that solve the equation, and be assured that any other set γ' you might have chosen instead is related to your set by a conjugation. |
| Mar19-11, 09:32 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Gamma matrices
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Gamma matrices | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| gamma matrices out of pauli matrices - symmetry/group theory | Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics | 0 | ||
| Gamma matrices | Advanced Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| Gamma matrices | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv | General Physics | 8 | ||