Your thoughts on a proof of Matrix Operations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the expression (A^{-1}B)^{-1}(C^{-1}A)^{-1}(B^{-1}C)^{-1} involving invertible matrices A, B, and C. The original poster attempts to find a more efficient method than direct computation to show that the result is the identity matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of matrix properties, such as the inverse of a product and the importance of order in matrix multiplication. There are questions about the validity of certain steps and properties, including distributive and associative properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on proving the inverse of a product, which may help in simplifying the original expression. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply these properties effectively, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses concern about the time-consuming nature of direct computation for an exam setting, indicating a need for a more efficient approach. There is also uncertainty about the application of certain matrix properties in their reasoning.

Divergent13
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Greetings!

I am asked to do the following:

Simplify [tex](A^{-1}B)^{-1}(C^{-1}A)^{-1}(B^{-1}C)^{-1}[/tex] for (n x n) invertible matrices A B and C.

You see, I was able to show that the result of this is simply the identity matrix [tex]I_n[/tex] by selecting 3 (2x2) matrices A B and C that were invertible, and just punched out the entire operation with them and ended up with the identity matrix I2... but clearly for an exam that would take way too long! How can I go about doing this using matrix properties? I am not sure how certain things cancel to get the Identity matrix...

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should first prove that [tex](XY)^{-1}=Y^{-1}X^{-1}[/tex], for any two non-singular ("invertible") n by n matrices X and Y. This is very easy, and when you've done it, the rest of your problem is also very easy.
 
So I understand that definition, and I obtain:

[tex](B^{-1}A)(A^{-1}C)(C^{-1}B)[/tex]

So I know that B^-1*B will yield the identity matrix, and the same identity matrices multipled by each other will be the same thing--- but in matrix mutliplication order is important--- so from here is it valid just to state this?
 
Would that qualify? I don't know if there's any "distributive" property i can use here.
 
What about associative?
 
Got It Thank You!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K