| New Reply |
Two current carrying wires. Confusion |
Share Thread |
| Mar27-11, 05:07 PM | #1 |
|
|
Two current carrying wires. Confusion
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Let there be two current carrying wires with current flowing in the same direction. According to my book, they attract by the right hand rule. Now here is my question, since the B-field is popping inwards for one of the wires and the other one is popping outwards in the middle between the two wires, wouldn't that mean the B-field is 0? If it is then how can the B-field come back outwards and inwards again? |
| Mar27-11, 05:10 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Mar27-11, 05:15 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
| Mar27-11, 05:17 PM | #4 |
|
|
Two current carrying wires. Confusion
Yes it is
|
| Mar27-11, 05:18 PM | #5 |
|
|
Then how can the Field come back in and out on the far right and left?
|
| Mar27-11, 05:22 PM | #6 |
|
Mentor
|
|
| Mar27-11, 05:22 PM | #7 |
|
|
like for electric field ... if you place a conductor in its path ... it is zero inside it but again gains its strength outside it |
| Mar27-11, 05:23 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| Mar27-11, 05:26 PM | #9 |
|
Mentor
|
Think about this in three dimensions.
The ONLY place the B field is zero is right along the line that's midway between the wires. |
| Mar27-11, 05:26 PM | #10 |
|
|
only at the mid point because only at that point their strengths become equal and opposite
Edit: Mag field due to long wire, [tex]\vec{B}= \frac{\mu_{o}}{2\pi}\frac{i}{d}[/tex] |
| Mar27-11, 05:29 PM | #11 |
|
|
Just one other question, I noticed the "finger" cross product rule is different from the wrap around right hand rule (not the curl one, like most calculus textbook teaches one) and this observation uses the wrap around the current rule
|
| Mar27-11, 05:35 PM | #12 |
|
Mentor
|
Be more specific.
Are you referring to the rule which gives the direction of the B field around a current carrying wire, as "the wrap around right hand rule" ? |
| Mar27-11, 05:37 PM | #13 |
|
|
Yes that one.
Another question If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity. |
| Mar27-11, 05:51 PM | #14 |
|
Mentor
|
One question at a time, please! Your threads tend to get convoluted when you have multiple questions and/or topics in one post. |
| Mar27-11, 05:53 PM | #15 |
|
|
OKay I will make a new thread and ask it there
|
| Mar27-11, 05:58 PM | #16 |
|
Mentor
|
No, it's OK now. Just didn't want to discuss two things in that one post -- plus it was a chance to give you a hard time. LOL
|
| Mar27-11, 06:13 PM | #17 |
|
Mentor
|
You need the B field (produced by the left wire) at the location of the wire on the right. The distance from on to the other is d. Let x = 0 if you like. |
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Two current carrying wires. Confusion
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Two current carrying wires perpendicular to each other | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Two current carrying wires perpendicular to each other | Introductory Physics Homework | 12 | ||
| Straight wires carrying current | Introductory Physics Homework | 6 | ||
| current carrying wires | Introductory Physics Homework | 1 | ||
| Current Carrying Wires--No force b/t them? | General Physics | 3 | ||