Stopping Distance & Coefficient of Friction for a Decelerating Car

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mivz18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car's stopping distance, acceleration, and the coefficient of friction on an incline. The original poster is attempting to determine the maximum angle at which the car can park on a hill, given the static coefficient of friction derived from previous parts of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the car on an incline, including normal force, static friction, and gravitational components. There are attempts to set up equations based on these forces to solve for the angle of the incline.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on analyzing the forces and setting up equations based on equilibrium conditions. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces and the angle, with no explicit consensus reached on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem's requirements, including the use of the static coefficient of friction and the need to analyze forces in both parallel and perpendicular directions to the incline.

Mivz18
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with the third part to this question:

On a level road with its brakes on, the shortest distance in which a car traveling with 93 km/hr can stop is 91 m. This shortest distance occurs when the driver uses anti-lock brakes which means that that the car brakes without skidding.

The first part asks what the magnitude of the acceleration of the car is and I found that to be the absolute value of 3.67.

The second part asks what the coefficient between the tires and the pavement is and I found that to be 0.374 .

The third part then asks How steep a hill can the car park on, with the angle to the horizontal. I have no clue how to go about this. The only hint or help given on the online program is "Since the car stopped without skidding, the coefficient of friction you found in part (b) is actually the static coefficient of friction, which is the proper coefficient of friction for this part as well. "

How do I go about figuring this out with the information I have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you draw an FBD for a block (car) resting on an inclined plane?
 
ok, I get three forces. I don't know how to demonstrate that here, but there is a normal force, static friction going up and mg force angled down in which you find by means of vector addition. So where would I go from there?
 
Well, if you say that the angle of the slope is [tex]\theta[/tex] then you should be able to calculate the component of gravity that acts along the slope which must be counteracted by, and the component which acts perpendicular to the slope which must be counteracted by the normal force. If you recall that [tex]F_{friction}=\mu_s N[/tex] you should be able to set up an equation with [tex]\theta[/tex] as the unknown.
 
I'm still kind of lost on this problem. When I try to look for Fnet, I get :

Fnet = W + N + Fs or
Fnet = mg + mgy + (mu)mg or
Fnet = mg + mgcosx + (mu)mg

Am I doing this correct so far??
 
You are correct that there are three forces acting on the car:
gravity, acting down
friction, acting up the incline
normal force, acting perpendicular to the incline

Now analyze the components of those forces parallel and perpendicular to the plane. (Since the car isn't moving, it's in equilibrium: the net force is zero in any direction.) Get two equations, one for each of those directions. Combine them to solve for the angle of the incline.
 
I'm in a bind. I figured out the Fnet for each direction:

Fnet of x = 0 = N - mg of y = mg - mgcosx
Fnet of y = 0 = Fs - mg of x = (mu)mg - mgsinx

Then, when I try to solve for theta (x), I get mg(1 - cosx) = mg( (mu) - sinx)
Simplified, 1-cosx = (mu) - sinx or 0.626 = cosx - sinx

Where do I go from here? Is this a trig equation trick that I'm overlooking? Because it isn't a half angle or anything like that? Or am I going in the wrong direction with this?
 
Mivz18 said:
I'm in a bind. I figured out the Fnet for each direction:

Fnet of x = 0 = N - mg of y = mg - mgcosx
Fnet of y = 0 = Fs - mg of x = (mu)mg - mgsinx
Your force equations have an error: the normal force is not mg. I'll rewrite them:
(1) [itex]N = mg cos\theta[/itex]
(2) [itex]\mu N = mg sin\theta[/itex]

Now see if you can solve for [itex]\theta[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K