QED vs Three Roads to Quantum Gravity: Which is Better?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter relativelyslow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between the books "QED" by Richard Feynman and "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" by Lee Smolin. Participants explore their content, focus, and suitability for readers interested in quantum mechanics and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the quality and relevance of "QED" compared to "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity," seeking insights on their topics.
  • Another participant asserts that "QED" is an excellent book, emphasizing its focus on the properties of light and stating that it does not address gravity.
  • A different participant shares their positive experience with "QED," recommending it for non-physicists and asking for follow-up book suggestions.
  • One participant notes that "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" seems to explore the relationship between quantum mechanics and relativity, indicating a different focus than "QED."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the topics covered by the two books, with some agreeing on the merits of "QED" while others highlight the distinct focus of "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity." The discussion remains unresolved regarding which book may be better suited for specific interests.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the depth of content in either book, and their assessments are based on limited information and personal opinions.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, quantum gravity, and the literature surrounding these topics may find this discussion relevant.

relativelyslow
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
is QED a good book? i was originally looking at three roads to quantum gravity, but on amazon.com someone said qed was better. are they both on the same topic? if anyone has any insight i would appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QED is an excellent book. I think everyone who is interested in quantum mechanics should get it. Those books are not at all about the same topic. Feynman's book is mostly about the properties of light. (QED is the theory about electrons, positrons and photons). I don't think it mentions gravity at all.
 
I just finished QED ... excellent book for non-phycisists.

Speaking of which, can anyone recommend a good follow-up book on the subject?
 
in reading the back and very little of the prologue, three roads to quantum gravity appears to attempt to find a link between quantum mechanics and relativity, or at least pose the problem and information. i may have to check qed out at the library
 

Similar threads

Undergrad QED Picture of static EM Fields
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad QED/Quantum Mechanics: Probability or Spatial Function?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad How can electrostatic fields be composed of photons?
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Undergrad One vertex interactions in QED - error in the book?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Renormalisation and running of the φ^3 and other coupling constants
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Graduate Non-Relativistic QED Textbook Reference - Zag
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Attractive force of opposite charges by McIrvin
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Graduate Cause of spontaneous emission?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
High School Question about QM and Neuroscience
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Graduate Feynman's QED: Is it Still Relevant Today?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K