Calculating the Angle to Hit a Target: Solving for X

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the angle at which a cannon should be fired to hit a target located 2000 meters away horizontally and 800 meters vertically. The problem involves concepts from projectile motion and requires understanding the relationships between distance, angle, and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various equations related to projectile motion, questioning the appropriateness of the formulas used. Some suggest using a system of equations to relate the horizontal and vertical components of motion, while others express uncertainty about how to account for gravity in their calculations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem and various approaches being discussed. Some participants have offered guidance on using specific equations, while others are grappling with the complexity of the calculations and the need for graphing to find solutions. No consensus has been reached on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential misunderstandings regarding the parameters of the problem and the equations applicable to projectile motion. There is a recognition of missing information and assumptions that may affect the calculations.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
A cannon fires a ball at 1000m/s. It needs to hit a target 2000m away horizontally and 800m away vertically. What angle should the cannon be fired at?

I used the equation h=v^2*sinx^2/[2g]

800=1000^2 * sinX^2 / [2(9.8)]

however, I gt 7.2 after I crunch out the numbers.
The answer into book says about 22 degrees.

what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used the equation h=v^2*sinx^2/[2g]

I think you better check your textbook.

The equation you used is only for finding the horizontal range not for the vertical height.

To solve the problem, you should really be looking at the formula of projectile motion.
 
All you've been told is that it must hit a target at a distance 2000m away and 800 m high. What makes you think that these paramaters necessarily correspond to the maximum height (and therefore the 2000m to half the range)?

Suppose the firing angle is [tex]\alpha[/tex] then the equation of trajectory of a projectile is

[tex]y = x\tan\alpha - \frac{1}{2}\frac{gx^2\sec^2\alpha}{u^2}[/tex]

Now do you know where you went wrong in your reasoning?

Hope that helps...
Cheers
Vivek
 
where:
y=800m ?
x=2000m ?
v=1000m/s ?

it doesn't come out equal
 
u know the distance in the x direction.

u know the distance in the y direction.

You know the initial velocity.

Find the horizontal and the vertical velocities.

Try to figure out a formula for finding the angle.

This should be in your book.

Use this formula to find the angle.

Hope this helps
 
Velocity in the x -direction. v0 * distance in the x direction

Velocity in the y direction v0 * distance in the y direction

tan theta = Vy/Vx

theta is inverse tan of Vy/Vx
 
yeah, but how do I take account for gravity?
 
I'm not sure if this is correct, but I was thinking maybe you should use a system of equations. Since you know the x-component of the velocity vector is 1000*cos(theta) and the y-component is 1000*sin(theta), you can use a system of equations to solve, I think, by substituting those above values in for [itex]v_o[/itex] in their respective equations. There's likely an easier method, though..

Here's a start:

[tex]1000cos(x)t = 2000[/tex]
[tex]1000sin(x) - 4.9t^2 = 800[/tex]

Hope that helps!
 
WOW, that took amazing long. But I got the answer...actually 3 worked. This is insane. Is there a faster way?

By they way, the equation should not be 1000sin(x)-4.9t^2=800, it should have been 1000sin(x)t-4.9t^2=800

(d=Vit+.5at^2)<-- you forgot the t after 1000sin(x) :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I'm curious what you did to get the final solution. I got the equation
2000tan(X)-19.6/cos^2(x)-800 and had to graph it to get the solution. It worked out but I never like having to graph things to get it.
 
  • #11
Yes, I did graph it

Go here to see what I did:
http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/pics001.jpg

It's not pretty but I don't know of a faster way
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Heh, I'm really sorry you had to solve that...crazy mess of a system it is. And I forgot about the "t," doh! :) I'm sure there's a better way, but I can't think of one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
14K