Calculating Mass of a Black Hole: A Primer

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tntcoder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for calculating the mass of a black hole, specifically using examples like Cygnus X-1. Participants explore various approaches, equations, and concepts related to black hole mass determination, including both classical mechanics and general relativity considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jack expresses uncertainty about how to calculate the mass of a black hole and asks for guidance on relevant examples and equations.
  • One participant suggests using Doppler shift data to determine the speed of a star orbiting the black hole, along with its orbital radius, to calculate the black hole's mass using Newton's gravitational formula.
  • Another participant shares a calculation of the Schwarzschild radius based on a mass of 1.2 x 10^31 kg, arriving at 17.7 km, but notes that their approach does not consider relativity.
  • A subsequent reply confirms the Schwarzschild radius calculation as approximately 17.8 km but emphasizes that the method used is based on Newtonian mechanics, which may not be fully accurate according to general relativity.
  • There is a discussion about the validity of using Newtonian mechanics for such calculations, with one participant arguing that it can yield correct results under certain conditions.
  • Another participant introduces the Magorrian relation as a method for calculating the mass of a central black hole in a galaxy, referencing a correlation found in a specific paper.
  • One participant claims to have derived the formula for the Schwarzschild radius using only Newtonian mechanics, asserting that it is appropriate for college-level physics.
  • A later post describes a new technique demonstrated in 2004 for measuring black hole mass, which combines general relativity with classical physics, highlighting advancements in observational methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the appropriateness of using Newtonian mechanics versus general relativity for black hole mass calculations. There is no consensus on the best method, and various approaches are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations rely on assumptions that may not hold in all scenarios, particularly regarding the applicability of Newtonian mechanics in the context of black holes. The discussion also touches on the limitations of not incorporating relativistic effects in certain calculations.

tntcoder
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im interested in calculating the mass of a black hole, but I am not actually sure how to approach it. I am guessing i want to take an example black hole, someone told me about the CYGNUS X-1 but i don't know if that's sutible. Can anyone point me to an example, or tell me the relevant equations and how to use them.

Cheers
Jack
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think to do this you need some doppler shift data. No idea where you could get some. Hoping somebody else can help you there.

This will tell you the speeds of a star orbitting the black.
You will also need to know the orbital radius of the orbitting star.

you can then equate its centripetal accelerationing force to Newtons universal gravitation formula. the mass of the orbitting star will cancel out allowing you to rearrange and calculate the mass of the black hole that it is orbitting.

Once you have mass of the black hole. you can then work out the schwarzschild radius for the star in question by working out the points were the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light.
 
update

can somebody check my calculations please

If the mass of the black hole is 1.2X10^31kg

then the schwarzschild radius that i calculated as 17.7km

For an object to escape the gravitiational field

the kinetic energy must be greater than or equal to gravitational potential energy.


so in this special case.

0.5c^2 >Vgrav

Vgrav<4.5X10^16 J/Kg

If we equate Vgrav to the gravitational potential equation

Vgrav = G * Mass of black holes/ Radius(this is where you will find the above Vgrav, hence its the point of no return)

Rearrange to make R subject

Then i got the answer as 17.7km

It sounds reasonable to me.

However, the calculations use what people here would regard as very basic physics forumulae. I have no considered relativity at all ( I can't but that's not the point )

hope somebody else can help as well.
 
$id said:
update

can somebody check my calculations please

If the mass of the black hole is 1.2X10^31kg

then the schwarzschild radius that i calculated as 17.7km

Yes, 2GM/c^2 = 17.8 km

For an object to escape the gravitiational field
the kinetic energy must be greater than or equal to gravitational potential energy.

The rest of your calculation, as you point out yourself, isn't based on relativity but on Newtonian mechanics. It's interesting that you wind up with the right answer, but the calculation itself isn't "right" according to GR.
 
pervect said:
Yes, 2GM/c^2 = 17.8 km



The rest of your calculation, as you point out yourself, isn't based on relativity but on Newtonian mechanics. It's interesting that you wind up with the right answer, but the calculation itself isn't "right" according to GR.


I thought that 2Gm/c^2 is derived from Newtonian mechanics.

I did explicity state i cannot use general relativity. The answer is correct because Newtonian mechanics is a approximation of general relativity under certain assumptions. Maybe it worked because i am dealing with things outside the black hole rather than inside it??
 
to calculate the mass of the central black hole of a galaxy you can use the Magorrian relation (a relation between the mass of the BH and the mass of the galactic bulge)
Alternatively, in this paper
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0006053
Ferrarese and Merritt found a very precisse correlation between the mass of nuclear BHs and the velocity dispersion of their host bulges
 
Last edited:
I managed to derive the forumula for this schwarzschild radius by netwonian mechanics alone

Equating 0.5c^2 to GM/r^2

C^2=2GM/r^2

r^2=2GM/c^2

R= SQRT(2Gm/C^2)

See no need for GR ( This is college level stuff)

R is distance at which the energy needed to escape equals gravitational potential.
 
A new technique to measure the mass of a black hole was demonstrated in september of 2004
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/printer_astronomers_watch_black_hole_eat.html
"Scientists have pieced together the journey of a bundle of doomed matter as it orbited a black hole four times, an observational first. Their technique provides a new method to measure the mass of a black hole; and this may enable the testing of Einstein's theory of gravity to a degree few thought possible.

A team led by Dr. Kazushi Iwasawa at the Institute of Astronomy (IoA) in Cambridge, England, followed the trail of hot gas over the course of a day as it whipped around the supermassive black hole roughly at the same distance the Earth orbits the Sun. Quickened by the extreme gravity of the black hole, however, the orbit took about a quarter of a day instead of a year.

The scientists could calculate the mass of the black hole by plugging in the measurements for the energy of the light, its distance from the black hole, and the time it took to orbit the black hole -- a marriage of Einstein's general relativity and good old-fashioned Keplerian physics."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K