Does Converging Sequence s_n Imply Converging Average t_n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter philosophking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Sequences
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the convergence of a sequence \( s_n \) and its average \( t_n \), defined as \( t_n = \frac{s_1 + s_2 + ... + s_n}{n} \). The main assertion is that if \( \lim_{n \to \infty} s_n = s \), then \( \lim_{n \to \infty} t_n = s \) must also hold true. The participants argue against this claim, suggesting that if \( s \) is finite, \( \lim_{n \to \infty} t_n \) could be zero, thus demonstrating that the limits do not necessarily align. The discussion emphasizes the need for a rigorous proof using the epsilon-delta definition of limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and their limits
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation and convergence
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Explore examples of converging and diverging sequences
  • Learn about Cesàro summation and its implications on averages of sequences
  • Investigate the properties of bounded sequences and their convergence behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in the analysis of sequences and limits, particularly in the context of real analysis and calculus.

philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Analysis problem (sequences)--please help

Here is the definition:

t_n = [s_1 + s_2 + ... + s_n] / n ; n >/= 1

I have to show that if lim n-> [infinity] s_n = s, then lim n-> [infinity] t_n = s

First of all, I don't think it's true. Because if s is finite, then lim s/n as n-> [infinity] would be zero, right? And thus lim t_n as n-> [infinity] is zero, and they're not the same.

I'm just wondering how to go about this problem. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would try it directly with the epsilon-delta definition of a limit.


BTW, you should be able to convince yourself that the limit of t_n is not always zero by considering a simple example.
 


The analysis problem you have presented deals with sequences, specifically the limit of a sequence. In order to solve this problem, we need to understand the definitions and properties of limits and sequences.

A sequence is a list of numbers arranged in a specific order. In this case, the sequence is denoted by t_n and is defined as the average of the first n terms of another sequence, denoted by s_n. The average is calculated by adding all the terms and dividing by the number of terms.

A limit is the value that a sequence approaches as the number of terms increases. In this case, we are interested in the limit as n approaches infinity. This means that we are looking at the behavior of the sequence as the number of terms becomes larger and larger.

Now, let's look at the first statement: if lim n-> [infinity] s_n = s. This means that as n approaches infinity, the terms of the sequence s_n get closer and closer to the value s. In other words, the terms of the sequence s_n are approaching the limit s.

Next, we have to show that if this statement is true, then lim n-> [infinity] t_n = s. This means that if the terms of the sequence s_n are approaching the limit s, then the terms of the sequence t_n, which are the averages of the terms of s_n, are also approaching the limit s.

To prove this, we can use the definition of the limit. We have to show that for any small positive number ε, there exists a positive integer N such that for all n > N, the difference between t_n and s is less than ε. In other words, we have to show that t_n is getting closer and closer to s as n approaches infinity.

Since we know that lim n-> [infinity] s_n = s, we can choose a large enough N such that for all n > N, the difference between s_n and s is less than ε/2. This means that for all n > N, we have:

|s_n - s| < ε/2

Now, let's look at the definition of t_n:

t_n = [s_1 + s_2 + ... + s_n] / n

We can rewrite this as:

t_n = [(s_1 - s) + (s_2 - s) + ... + (s_n - s) + ns] / n

Notice that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K