Equation for magnetic field line of dipole

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for magnetic field lines of a dipole in spherical coordinates. The original poster presents the magnetic field equation and seeks to demonstrate that the field line equation is r = R sin² θ, where R is defined at the equator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the magnetic field components and the differential equation for field lines. There are attempts to clarify the derivation process and the meaning of field lines in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the equations involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between the field components and the field line equation, but no consensus has been reached on the derivation steps.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the condition that r = R when θ = π/2, which is relevant to the problem setup. Additionally, some participants express confusion about the definitions and relationships involved in the equations.

erogard
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hi, given the equation for a dipole magnetic field in spherical coordinates:

<br /> \vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0 M}{4 \pi} \frac{1}{r^3} \left[ \hat{r} 2 \cos \theta + \bf{\hat{\theta}} \sin \theta \right]<br />

I need to show that the equation for a magnetic field line is r = R \sin^2 \theta
where R is the radius of the magnetic field at the equator (theta = pi/2)

Not sure where to start. I know that the gradient of B would give me a vector that is perpendicular to a given field line...

I also know that a vector potential for a dipole magnetic field in spherical coordinate is given by

<br /> A_\theta = \frac{\mu_0 M}{4 \pi} \frac{sin\theta}{r^2}<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation for a field line is \frac{dr}{d\theta}=B_r/B_\theta.
I don't think this gives sin^2\theta.
 
Clem has omitted an r.

Clem meant: \frac{B_r}{B_\theta} = \frac{dr}{r d\theta}.

dr is the radial increment in the line corresponding to a tangential increment r d\theta.

The resulting DE is solved by separating variables, and yield logs on each side. You use the condition that r = R when \theta = \pi/2 to re-express the arbitrary constant. You do get just what you said.
 
But why is the equation for the field lines:

\frac{B_r}{B_\theta} = \frac {dr}{rd\theta} ??

I can see how solve this to give the equation:

r = R sin^2 \theta

where R is r when θ is ∏/2. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
You need to recall what is meant by a field line: a line whose direction at every point along it is the direction of the field at that point. So the ratio of radial to tangential field components must be the same as the ratio of tangential to radial components of the line increment.
 
Thanks that is great I get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
910
Replies
1
Views
2K