Waves & Sound: How deep is your well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter internetimothy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound Waves
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the depth of a well based on the time it takes for a stone to fall and the sound of its splash to travel back up. The context is rooted in kinematics and sound propagation, with specific parameters such as time and temperature influencing the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish relationships between the time taken for the stone to fall and the time for sound to travel back up, using kinematic equations and the speed of sound. Some participants provide guidance on rearranging the equations into a standard quadratic form, while others express surprise at the original poster's difficulty with algebraic manipulation.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in clarifying the relationships and guiding the original poster towards completing the algebraic steps necessary to solve the problem. There is a sense of progress as the original poster indicates they can proceed with the problem after receiving assistance.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the temperature affecting the speed of sound, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about algebraic techniques needed to manipulate the equations. Additionally, there are references to potential errors in the presentation of the quadratic formula, highlighting the importance of precision in mathematical communication.

internetimothy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a problem for my Grade 11 class.

A stone is dropped down a well, and, 16 seconds later, the sound of it splashing into the water is heard by people at ground level. The temperature in the well is 10 degress celsius.

I'm asked to find the depth of the well. So, what I've done so far is this...

I've said the change in time for the falling rock will be 'y' and the change in time for the sound traveling back up will be '16 - y'. The distance from the top of the well to the point of impact (source of the sound) is 'x'. Given negligible air resistance and whatnot, a = g. The speed of the sound returning up the well will be 332 m/s + 0.6 (10 degrees C), or 338 m/s.

I've taken my kinematics equations, and said that, for the falling rock, x = 1/2gy^2, and for the sound traveling up, x = 338 m/s * (16-y). I've set the two equal, but I can't do anything past this point. For some reason, I can't remember the algebraic ... uh, stuff.. that I'd need to do this. I'm thinking I should convert what I have to a quadratic (a + b -c = 0?) and then use the quadratic equation, but I can't remember how to do that.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1/2*9.8*y^2 = 338(16-y) is what you have. Converting to ay^2 + by + c = 0 shouldn't be too bad: Just distribute the 338 on the right hand side and subtract it over to the left hand side.
 
Looks like you have done the hard part correctly, this getting the correct relationships. I am surprised that you can't finish the simple algebra!
You have:
[tex]x = \frac {gy^2} 2 = v_s ( 16-y)[/tex]
( vs is the speed of sound )
so now all you need do is assemble the pieces to get the standard from of a quadratic.
First distribute vs across the RHS (Right Hand Side)

[tex]x = \frac {gy^2} 2 = v_s 16- v_s y[/tex]
Now add
[tex]x = -(v_s 16-v_s y)[/tex]

to each side, to get,



[tex]\frac {gy^2} 2 + v_s y - 16 v_s = 0[/tex]

Now for a refresher

if you have a quadratic

[tex]ax^2 + bx +c =0[/tex]
The roots are:

[tex]x = \frac { -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4 ac}} 2a[/tex]

Can you complete your problem now?
 
Mmm..awesome. Yeah, I can do this now. Thanks!
 
just to be clear once you have the change in time for the falling rock you can the put that time into d= at^2/2 correct? just for future reference, what is the correct answer?
 
Integral said:
The roots are:

[tex]x = \frac { -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4 ac}} 2a[/tex]

Just to avoid any confusion, I believe you meant the a to be in the denominator as well.
 
Last edited:
Sirus,

As you well know you are correct! Unfortunately, it is now to late to fix the error so it must stay as is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K