Simple index notation question

by PhyPsy
Tags: index notation, kronecker delta, multiplication
PhyPsy is offline
Sep29-11, 04:24 PM
P: 39
Is Tab[itex]\partial[/itex]cf = Tac[itex]\partial[/itex]bf, where T is a tensor?

Seems to me like you should be able to do this:

Maybe I'm using the Kronecker delta incorrectly. Could someone check this for me?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
WannabeNewton is offline
Sep29-11, 04:52 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,912
You can't introduce the kronecker delta in that way or any summation for that matter. You have the index b on the kronecker delta being summed over two other indices which does not conform to the summation convention and makes no sense in that regard. You would have to write something like [itex]T_{ab}\partial _{c}f = T_{ab}\delta ^{d}_{c}\partial _{d}f[/itex]; you can tell that the free indices are the same on both sides.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Question- abstract index notation Differential Geometry 5
a question about index notation Quantum Physics 3
Question on Elementary Index Notation Calculus 2
Another index notation question...hopefully pretty easy General Math 3
Question about what index notation is telling me General Math 1