Simple index notation question


by PhyPsy
Tags: index notation, kronecker delta, multiplication
PhyPsy
PhyPsy is offline
#1
Sep29-11, 04:24 PM
P: 39
Is Tab[itex]\partial[/itex]cf = Tac[itex]\partial[/itex]bf, where T is a tensor?

Seems to me like you should be able to do this:
Tab[itex]\partial[/itex]cf
=Tab[itex]\delta[/itex]bc[itex]\partial[/itex]bf
=Tac[itex]\partial[/itex]bf

Maybe I'm using the Kronecker delta incorrectly. Could someone check this for me?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Internet co-creator Cerf debunks 'myth' that US runs it
Astronomical forensics uncover planetary disks in Hubble archive
Solar-powered two-seat Sunseeker airplane has progress report
WannabeNewton
WannabeNewton is offline
#2
Sep29-11, 04:52 PM
C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
WannabeNewton's Avatar
P: 4,941
You can't introduce the kronecker delta in that way or any summation for that matter. You have the index b on the kronecker delta being summed over two other indices which does not conform to the summation convention and makes no sense in that regard. You would have to write something like [itex]T_{ab}\partial _{c}f = T_{ab}\delta ^{d}_{c}\partial _{d}f[/itex]; you can tell that the free indices are the same on both sides.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Question- abstract index notation Differential Geometry 5
a question about index notation Quantum Physics 3
Question on Elementary Index Notation Calculus 2
Another index notation question...hopefully pretty easy General Math 3
Question about what index notation is telling me General Math 1