The Mystery of Planetary Cores: Fission or Fusion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermal characteristics of planetary cores, specifically whether processes such as fusion or fission contribute to their heat. Participants explore the reasons behind the varying temperatures of planetary cores, including Earth, and consider the implications of mass and gravity on these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether fusion or fission processes occur in planetary cores, particularly in relation to their temperatures.
  • One participant asserts that thermonuclear fission or fusion reactions are not possible in planetary cores, citing the need for sufficient mass and gravity to generate heat.
  • Another participant suggests that the heat of the Earth's core cannot solely be attributed to initial compression, proposing alternative heat sources such as radiogenic decay from heavy elements or core-mantle friction.
  • Questions are raised about how geologists determine the temperature of the Earth's core and the implications of cooling over time.
  • The role of mass in sustaining thermonuclear fusion in stars is discussed, with a focus on the necessary conditions for fusion to occur.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the heat of planetary cores, with no consensus reached on the role of fusion or fission processes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific sources of heat within planetary interiors.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the relationship between mass, gravity, and core temperature are not fully explored. The discussion also references external sources for heat flow data, which may not be universally accepted or verified.

so-crates
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Is it know why the Earth's core, and indeed the cores of other planets, are "hot" while some are cold? Is it possible that fusion or fission processes are taking place there ?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
No, there's not a chance of any thermonuclear fission or fusion reactions there.

How do scientists know if the core is not? If a celestial body is big enough the core will be hot inevitably, because of the compression of internal materials by gravity. Bodies such as satellites and Pluto have cold cores because of insufficiency of gravity, I'm guessing.
 
Is it that, the sun contains thermonuclear fusion specificly because it is of high enough mass?
 
Compression of mass is static and the terrestrial planet would cool off eventially abeit in hundred millions years.

Temperature of the core is around 5500K, way too hot to be residual from the initial compression. Hence there is a heat generator inside. What is it? take your pick, the following are candidates:

radiogenic decay from heavy atoms U - Th series
40K decay.

Or perhaps Core - mantle friction (section 3.2)?
 
Could you please explain why it would cool off? How do geologists know how hot the core is?
 
Sure, Why it would cool off is also answered here although it seems that the links to the original is broken.

http://www.geo.lsa.umich.edu/IHFC/heatflow.html you can see the interior heat flow at the surface of the Earth. It appears to average about 100 milli watt per second per square meter. And there are a lot of square meters.

Anyway, this seems to be an excellent place where the heat balance of the Earth is presented.

More later
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mk said:
Is it that, the sun contains thermonuclear fusion specificly because it is of high enough mass?

Yes, the enormous mass of a star is required to generate the necesasry pressure/temperature to get atoms to undergo fusion (occurs in the central core of the star). Actually, astronomical objects are classified as stars only if they can sustain fusion in their core.
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K