What is special about HIV that makes it unbeatable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the unique characteristics of HIV that complicate the immune response, exploring why the human body struggles to eliminate the virus compared to other viruses. It includes theoretical and conceptual aspects of virology and immunology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that HIV mutates rapidly, evading the immune system's recognition and response, which is not the case with many other viruses.
  • It is mentioned that HIV attacks the very immune cells required to combat it, complicating the body's ability to fight off the virus and other infections.
  • One participant raises the question of whether other viruses exhibit similar evasion strategies as HIV, leading to a discussion about related viruses in primates.
  • Another participant discusses the TRIM5 gene's role in tagging HIV proteins for destruction, while also mentioning the CypA gene's interference with this process, suggesting a complex interaction that may affect susceptibility to HIV.
  • There is a mention of a specific mutation that can confer immunity to HIV, referencing the case of Stephen Crohn and the genetic mutation affecting the CCR-5 protein, which HIV uses to enter cells.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanisms of HIV's evasion of the immune system, with some agreeing on the mutation aspect while others introduce additional factors like genetic immunity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these findings.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific genetic interactions and the relevance of experimental findings to natural infections, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in virology, immunology, genetics, and the complexities of viral infections may find this discussion insightful.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Why is it that with many viruses the human body can make specific cells that can destroy the virus completely, but not with HIV?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
white blood cells recognize an intruder virus by its receptor proteins. With most viruses, after a while the body learns it is a threat goes about disposing of it. But with HIV, every time the body tries to attack it, it mutates, and since the body doesn't recognize it as a danger anymore (since there are different proteins) it leaves it alone. In the process, the HIV is destroying white blood cells, making the bodies job even more difficult. The ultimate result is that your immune system is left in tatters, by which time you have aids.
 
That was simpler than I expected, thanks.

Are there any other viruses that do this, or is it just HIV?
 
I cannot think of any off hand that pertain to humans but there are several similar viruses found in primate species that act the same way, hence the ape-human transition belief?
HIV-1 is extremely similar to SIV in Chimpanzee's. Somebody would know a whole heck of a lot more than me on the similaritiest between these two viruses.
 
Mutations cause changes in amino acid sequence, and they are responsible for synthesis of proteins, the epitope is now different structually, and so the antibody does not recognise the antigen.
 
wasteofo2 said:
Why is it that with many viruses the human body can make specific cells that can destroy the virus completely, but not with HIV?

HIV attacks the very cells needed to destroy it, and needed to fight off the other opportunistic infections characteristic of AIDS. There are other viruses, such as in the Herpes family (including chicken pox) that are not eliminated from the body once it is infected, but remain latent. You may never get sick from them again, or you might get sick often.
 
I just read a really interesting article on HIV in my genetics class. It was a paper published in Nature, and the scientists discovered a gene called TRIM5 in humans that tag HIV capsid proteins for destruction (hence preventing infection). But the thing is.. that in humans, we have a CypA gene that encodes for a protein that blocks the receptor on the viral capsid, blocking its interaction with the TRIM5 product. Well the scientists did this experiment or found something.. where the CypA gene was fused to the end of the TRIM5 gene, and apparently, having that gene confers resistance to the HIV virion.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not very good at interpretting papers.

K.
 
kalladin said:
I just read a really interesting article on HIV in my genetics class. It was a paper published in Nature, and the scientists discovered a gene called TRIM5 in humans that tag HIV capsid proteins for destruction (hence preventing infection). But the thing is.. that in humans, we have a CypA gene that encodes for a protein that blocks the receptor on the viral capsid, blocking its interaction with the TRIM5 product. Well the scientists did this experiment or found something.. where the CypA gene was fused to the end of the TRIM5 gene, and apparently, having that gene confers resistance to the HIV virion.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not very good at interpretting papers.

K.

We can't correct your interpretation unless you cite the paper. Slick move. :wink:

Are CypA and TRIM5 ever found together in vivo? Or was this just one of those fusion proteins that has no relevance to what actually happens in the animal? I've seen some bizarre stuff done in the name of molecular biology. :biggrin: Seriously, that's a question to ask yourself when reading papers; is this relevant to what really happens in the animal? And if you can't get the answer from that paper, you have to dig back to another and another paper. Before you know it, you'll be an expert on CypA and TRIM5. :wink:
 
Just a note, but HIV is not unbeatable. It cannot be eradicated from an infected person, but a given person can be immune to its effects. This was found out in the well-known case of Stephen Crohn, who survived infection without any ill effects. A mutation passed down from survivors of the black plague renders ineffective the gene coding for the CCR-5 protein in those who have the mutation. This is the protein that the HIV virus recognizes and uses to enter human lymphocytes. If the person doesn't have this protein, then he is impervious to the virus. Whether or not this mutation can be introduced into a person that isn't born with it, and thus be used as a form of treatment, is another question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K