A wire with a resistance R is lengthened to 1.25

  • Thread starter Thread starter discoverer02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance Wire
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a wire with an initial resistance R that is stretched to 1.25 times its original length. Participants are discussing how this change in length affects the resistance of the wire, referencing the relationship between resistance, resistivity, length, and cross-sectional area.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the wire's length and radius, questioning whether the decrease in radius is proportional to the increase in length. They discuss the implications of volume conservation and its effect on resistance calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between area and length, leading to a reevaluation of the original calculations. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations regarding the proportionality of changes in dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the volume of the wire remains constant during the stretching process, which influences their calculations of resistance.

discoverer02
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
My answer for this problem doesn't agree with the answer in the back of my textbook book:

A wire with a resistance R is lengthened to 1.25 times its original length by being pulled through a small hole. Find the resistance of the wire after it has been stretched.

R = pL/A

p = resistivity
L = length
A = area of a cross section perpendicular to the length
r = radius

R1 = pL1/A1

L2 = 1.25L1 so r1/r2 should equal 1.25 right.

The decrease in radius should be proportional to the increase in length.

So r2 = r1/1.25

Therefore R2 = p(1.25L1)/[pi](r1/1.25)^2 = R1(1.25*1.56) = 1.95R1

The answer in the back of my textbook is R2 = 1.56R1

Where have I gone wrong?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The decrease in radius should be proportional to the increase in length.

Should it? How would you go about proving this?
 
I'm assuming it's proportional. If it's not then I'm lost
 


Originally posted by discoverer02

L2 = 1.25L1 so r1/r2 should equal 1.25 right.


Volume is constant, and volume is L*A, not L*r
 
You're right. Stupid me!

The area would have to shrink proportionally: A2 = A1/1.25 so R2 = 1.25*1.25R1 = 1.56R1.

Thank you very much for the help. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K