Classical Tunneling: Instantons Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scariari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Tunneling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of instantons in the context of quantum tunneling and their relation to classical solutions in imaginary time, particularly within the framework of quantum field theory (QFT) and Euclidean spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the connection between quantum tunneling and instantons, specifically regarding classical solutions at imaginary times.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding instantons may require a solid foundation in quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT), indicating the complexity of the topic.
  • The concept of "imaginary times" is explained as relating to calculations performed in Euclidean spacetime, which differs from the usual Minkowski space used in classical vacuum considerations.
  • A soliton is introduced as a concept that interpolates between different vacuum states, with a comparison made to instantons, which are described as solitons in four-dimensional space that change the winding number of the vacuum.
  • The term "tunnel effect" is associated with instantons due to the presence of an energy barrier between two vacuum states.
  • A participant references their avatar, which relates to the formula for the winding number of the F field, indicating a personal connection to the topic.
  • A question is posed regarding the definition of Euclidean spacetime, specifically whether it refers to the metric ds² = dx² + dy² + dz² + dt².

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints and interpretations regarding the nature of instantons and their relationship to quantum tunneling, with no consensus reached on the foundational understanding required for the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the concepts involved, including the need for a solid grasp of both quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as the specific definitions and implications of terms like "imaginary times" and "Euclidean spacetime." Some assumptions about the participants' prior knowledge may be missing.

scariari
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Im learning about quantum tunneling and read something about that there are classical solutions at imaginary times, so called instantons? Can anyone help me out with this connection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not easy, and maybe should be delayed until you have actually gone beyond QM, and learned a good deal of QFT.

When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).

Do you know what a soliton is ?
A soliton typically interpolates between different vacua at infinity.
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/research/Geom/sg.gif
they can go through each other.
Now imagine there is only one of those around : at infinity on the left, there is not the same winding number than at infinity on the right.
An instanton is just a soliton in 4-dim space.
Actually, instantons change the winding number of the vacuum too. It is just less easy to picture in the case.

The reason we call this a tunnel effect, is that there is an energy barrier between the two vacua states.
 
and by the way : the avatar I am using is the formula which gives the winding number of the F field :smile:
 
humanino said:
When they say "imaginary times" it refers to the fact that those solutions are calculated in Euclidean spacetime : this is just ordinary metric 4-dim space. This is NOT Minkowski space, which is the usual way to think about vacuum (at least in classical terms).
You mean where ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 + dt^2?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K