Calculate Expectation Value of Particle in Infinite Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul11273
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of momentum for a particle in an infinite potential box, specifically focusing on the expression for where n is a positive integer. Participants express confusion about the problem setup and the necessary mathematical steps to derive the expectation value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of the expectation value and the application of wave functions in the context of an infinite potential well. There are inquiries about the correctness of the problem statement and the implications of the infinite box setup. Some participants attempt to derive the expectation value using integrals and differentiation of trigonometric functions, while others suggest clarifying the notation and approach to the derivatives involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's mathematical expressions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of the momentum operator and the differentiation of trigonometric functions, but no consensus has been reached on the final expression or approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion about whether the problem refers to an infinite or finite box, with participants clarifying that "infinite" refers to the potential depth rather than the width. Additionally, there are concerns about the complexity of raising trigonometric functions to powers and the implications for the integration process.

paul11273
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I have a question regarding the expectation value of particle:

"Obtain an expression for the expectation value [tex]<p_{x}^n>[/tex] where n is 1,2,3... of a particle in an infinite box (U = infinity for x<0 and x>L; U=0 for 0<x<L) which is in an eigenstate of the energy."

That is the question word for word.
Now, I have basically no idea where to even begin with this. The Prof zipped through it just so he can say he covered the material during the final class. Now we have to answer questions and I am lost.

I know no one likes to give answers without seeing work, but I simply don't know what to do.
Any help with a push in the right direction would be great.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paul11273 said:
I have a question regarding the expectation value of particle:

"Obtain an expression for the expectation value [tex]<p_{x}^n>[/tex] where n is 1,2,3... of a particle in an infinite box (U = infinity for x<0 and x>L; U=0 for 0<x<L) which is in an eigenstate of the energy."

That is the question word for word.
Now, I have basically no idea where to even begin with this. The Prof zipped through it just so he can say he covered the material during the final class. Now we have to answer questions and I am lost.

I know no one likes to give answers without seeing work, but I simply don't know what to do.
Any help with a push in the right direction would be great.

Thanks.

U mean finite box... :rolleyes: If then,use normalized wave functions of the system and compute that average.I'm afraid you'll have to know how to differentiate "n" times a trigonometric function.That's not so hard.It requires some attention with the phases.
I hope u're aware of the definition for an expectation value for an operator,call it [itex]\hat{A}[/itex],in the
[tex]<\hat{A}>_{\psi(\vec{r})}=\int\int\int_{R^3} \psi^*(\vec{r}) A(\vec{r}) \psi(\vec{r})[/tex]
,where of course,the operator must written in the coordinate representation.In your case,it's simple,since the problem is unidimentional.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby, thanks for the reply.

As for the question, it definitely states an infinite box. Do you think this could be an error in the question?

I know what you mean by the formula you provided. We did go over that in class. I also follow you on the fact that this is one dimension.
I think I am getting lost now on what you mentioned about taking the derivative of a trig function to the n power.

This is what I have so far...

[tex]<p_{x}^n>=\int\psi^*(x) p(x)^n \psi(x) dx[/tex]

where
[tex]\psi^*=\psi_{n}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} sin \left( \frac{n\pi{x}} {L} \right)[/tex]

and
[tex]\frac{d\psi}{dx}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \left( \frac{n\pi}{L} \right) cos \left( \frac{n\pi{x}}{L} \right)[/tex]

I get
[tex]<p_{x}^n>=\int\psi^* \left( \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{d}{dx} \right)^n \psi dx[/tex]

[tex]<p_{x}^n>=\left( \frac{\hbar}{i} \right)^n \left( \frac{2}{L} \right)^n \left( \frac{n\pi}{L} \right)^n \int_{0}^{L}sin \left( \frac{n\pi{x}}{L} \right) \left( cos\left(\frac{n\pi{x}}{L} \right) \right)^ndx[/tex]

Whew! That was a lot of LaTex to write.
Assuming I am correct to this point, what comes next? The cos function raised to the n power is really killing me here. Or, is this my expression, as the question calls for?

Finally, I have read that the expectation value of the particles momentum is zero since this is an average of the momentum as it moves back and forth.
Am I reading that correctly? If not, please explain.

Thanks.

edited twice for dumb errors.
 
Last edited:
paul11273 said:
As for the question, it definitely states an infinite box. Do you think this could be an error in the question?
No. "Infinite" refers to depth of the box (walls are infinitely high) not the width. (Often this is called an infinite square well potential.) As opposed to a finite box, where the sides are some finite magnitude; the finite square well potential problem is harder to solve.
 
paul11273 said:
[tex]<p_{x}^n>=\int\psi^* \left( \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{d}{dx} \right)^n \psi dx[/tex]

[tex]<p_{x}^n>=\left( \frac{\hbar}{i} \right)^n \left( \frac{2}{L} \right)^n \left( \frac{n\pi}{L} \right)^n \int_{0}^{L}sin \left( \frac{n\pi{x}}{L} \right) \left( cos\left(\frac{n\pi{x}}{L} \right) \right)^ndx[/tex]


There is an error between these two lines. You are raising the momentum operator to the nth power, not the wave function.
 
Thanks a lot for the tip.

In that case I think I need to remove the exponent of n on the cos function.
Is that right?
If so, that probably makes it much easier to deal with.
I will try to work through that scenario later and post my result.
If that is the wrong approach, please let me know before I kill myself on it. :smile:

Thanks.
 
Hypnotoad is correct. The rightmost part of your integrand is going to be a cosine to the first power or a sine to the first power, depending on whether n is odd or even.
 
Janitor said:
Hypnotoad is correct. The rightmost part of your integrand is going to be a cosine to the first power or a sine to the first power, depending on whether n is odd or even.

I believe it can be put in a form containing only sine,irrelevant of the even/odd form of the "n".BTW,the "n" in the argument is not the same with the exponent of the operators.So le't call it "m" the one from the argumrnt of the wave function:
He has to compute this derivetive:
[tex]\frac{d^{n}}{dx^{n}} \cos({\frac{m\pi x}{L}})[/tex]
Where "m" and "n" are natural numbers,nonconnected.
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \cos x =(-)^{1} cos (x+\frac{\pi}{2})[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \cos x =(-)^{2} cos (x+\frac{2\pi}{2})[/tex]
So i could prove by induction that
[tex]\frac{d^{n}}{dx^{n}} \cos x =(-)^{n} cos (x+\frac{n\pi}{2})[/tex]
Now,i change the argument [itex]x\rightarrow \frac{m\pi x}{L}[/itex] and get
[tex]\frac{d^{n}}{dx^{n}} \cos({\frac{m\pi x}{L}}) =(-)^{n}(\frac{m\pi}{L})^{n}<br /> cos ({\frac{m\pi x}{L}+\frac{n\pi}{2}})[/tex]
which can be put in a form involving [itex]\sin[/itex]
and from there,the integral can be made easily.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K