
#1
Jan1912, 10:26 AM

P: 423

Hey! I'm trying to understand time dilation in terms of minkowski diagrams.
Below I've added a diagram showing the two coordinate systems where the primed one moves relative to the unprimed one with a speed v. My reasoning in this diagram is that when the observer in the unprimed system compares the clock in the primed system with his own that corresponds to comparing the spacetime coordinates with eachother. He therefore assigns (t,x) while the primed observed assigns (t',0). Or in other words, as he sees t on his clock he simultaneously sees t' on the primed observers clock. But from my diagram it clearly seams like t' > t which is not consitent with the result that t = (gamma)t' > t; i.e the unprimed observer should see the moving clock run slow not vice versa. What is wrong with my reasoning here? 



#2
Jan1912, 10:50 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,108

In your spacetime diagram, " t' > t " is not correct because you must
measure intervals (spacetime separations) with Minkowskian spacetime geometrynot Euclidean geometry. In Minkowski spacetime, " t' < t ". [Note that in a PHY 101 positionvstime diagram (which has an underlying [and underappreciated] Galilean spacetime geometry) we have " t' = t ".] 



#3
Jan1912, 11:11 AM

P: 423

But should it not be possible to analyse the problem in euclidian geometry aswell? I mean in two dimentional space time the lorentz transformations has a corresponding picture:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mi...asymmetric.svg 



#4
Jan1912, 11:18 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,108

Time dilation in minkowski diagrams
Although the spacetime diagram is drawn on a plane (like a familiar Euclidean geometry diagram is), the problem is how to measure "lengths" along worldlines (physically representing durations of elapsed time).
One way is to draw hyperbolas (for Minkowski spacetime) instead of circles (for Euclidean geometry). These represent the locus of points [events] that are "equidistant" from a given point [event] in the corresponding geometry. Another way is to trace out lightrays from lightclocks [as done in my avatar]. What is interesting about that diagram in my avatar is that the spacetimevolume enclosed between each tick [the volume contained inside the intersection of the future light cone of one tick and the past light cone of the next tick] is Lorentz invariant. 



#5
Jan1912, 11:50 AM

P: 423

So could I then conclude that any kind of analysis in such a diagram which really involves lengths or differences in coordinates is invalid? Is for example a similar analysis on length contraction also invalid?
This in contrast to analysis only which involves separate spacetime events like this one: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=407012 Is that kind of analysis valid because it does not involve distance? Btw: Could you recommend any material where I could read up on the properties of Minkowski space you're takling about? :) 



#6
Jan1912, 12:07 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,108

Note that diagrams in the thread you linked to
has scales drawn along each line... and that those scales are not consistent with Euclidean geometry in the plane. In other words, along lines through the origin, the points at "1 tick mark from the origin" do not trace out a circle... but they do trace out a hyperbola. Can you see your diagram in the diagrams in that postedthread? t'=0.8 and t=1.0... thus t' < t. 



#7
Jan1912, 12:25 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,552





#8
Jan1912, 12:41 PM

P: 423





#9
Jan1912, 12:51 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,552





#10
Jan1912, 01:07 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 4,108

Taylor & Wheeler: http://www.eftaylor.com/download.htm...ial_relativity [see part two]. Dray: http://www.physics.oregonstate.edu/coursewikis/GSR/ Moore: http://www.amazon.com/IdeasThatSha.../dp/0072397144 or http://www.amazon.com/TravelersGuid.../dp/0070430276 Ellis & Williams: http://www.amazon.com/FlatCurvedSp.../dp/0198511698 I've got something brewing... but it's not quite ready yet. 



#11
Jan1912, 02:36 PM

P: 848

Here are three different frames showing relationship to the hyperbolic calibration curves. I'm showing the event labled "NOW" for each observer such that each observer is located on the same hyperbolic curve (same proper time). Notice that the simlultaneous X1 space for each observer is a line tangent to the hyperbolic curve. So, you can see how the projections from frame to frame give the time dilations.




#12
Jan1912, 02:41 PM

P: 423





#13
Jan1912, 02:44 PM

P: 848

I think it's easier to see the time dilations using a symetric spacetime diagram. Have two observers moving in opposite directions with the same speed relative to a rest frame as shown in the diagram below. Then you can see the derivation of the hyperbolic calibration curves.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Help with understanding Minkowski diagrams  Special & General Relativity  3  
Yes/No question about Minkowskidiagrams  Advanced Physics Homework  1  
Minkowski spacetime diagrams, what does the hyperbola represent?  Advanced Physics Homework  1  
Rotation and Minkowski diagrams.  Special & General Relativity  7  
Rotation and Minkowski diagrams.  Special & General Relativity  0 