The Big Bang: String or Brane?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KaneOris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang String
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the M theory and its implications for the Big Bang, specifically the hypothesis that the event was caused by the collision of two branes. Participants explore the concept that strings can morph into branes under sufficient energy, leading to the expansion of the universe. The conversation emphasizes the speculative nature of string theory and the need for testable predictions. The topic is suggested for further exploration in a Q&A session with Dr. Kaku.

PREREQUISITES
  • M Theory fundamentals
  • String theory concepts
  • Understanding of branes and their interactions
  • Basic knowledge of cosmology and the Big Bang theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research M Theory and its implications for cosmology
  • Study the process of string morphing into branes
  • Examine the energy requirements for brane expansion
  • Prepare questions for the Q&A session with Dr. Kaku
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students interested in advanced theoretical physics, particularly those exploring the intersections of string theory and cosmological events like the Big Bang.

KaneOris
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Now i really don't know much about the M theory so if i say anything stupid give me a break, now I've heard heard the theory that the big bang was the collision of 2 branes, 1 into the other. Now i can see this happening and being the cause of it and would imply it will keep happening, but I've also heard that a string can "morph" into a brane with enough energy, with even more energy these branes will expand. Now with the idea our universe is just a brane so to speak. Couldnt the big bang be the result of a string morphing into a brane, and with enough energy to keep expanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's possible, at least in string theory. Then again, just about anything is possible in string theory. I am reluctant to entertain a stringy explanation of everything before it makes a testable explanation of anything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K