Uncovering the True Nature of NOx Production in Heat Engines

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the production of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in heat engines and turbomachinery, focusing on the conditions that enhance NOx generation, particularly at high temperatures and near stoichiometric fuel-to-air ratios. Participants seek to understand the chemical mechanisms and thermodynamic principles behind NOx formation in combustion chambers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that NOx is produced at high temperatures and near stoichiometric fuel-to-air ratios, seeking a chemist's perspective on why these conditions enhance NOx generation.
  • Another participant explains that high temperatures lower the Gibbs free energy (G) and increase the rate constant of the reaction between nitrogen and oxygen, suggesting that this makes NOx formation more thermodynamically and kinetically favorable.
  • A different participant argues that the explanation provided is too general and emphasizes that NOx reactions exhibit particular behavior under specific conditions, such as high temperatures and stoichiometric ratios, which are avoided in practice.
  • One participant proposes that plotting the activity or fugacity of oxygen as a function of fuel-to-air ratio (FAR) could provide insights, indicating that low activity at rich conditions leads to low NOx production, while high activity at lean burns results in higher NOx production.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the terms "aO2" and "fO2," which are clarified as activity and fugacity, respectively, and related to partial pressure approximations in combustion scenarios.
  • A participant discusses the role of nitrogen's inertness and the activation energy required for its reaction with oxygen, noting that high temperatures during heavy load conditions facilitate NOx formation, while lower temperatures favor CO2 emissions.
  • One participant mentions that a slightly leaner than ideal air-fuel ratio (around 15 to 17) tends to produce the most NOx, but also suggests that very lean mixtures may reduce NOx emissions due to lower associated temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the conditions affecting NOx production, with some agreeing on the significance of temperature and fuel-to-air ratios, while others highlight the complexity and nuances of the reactions involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise relationships and mechanisms at play.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their explanations, including the generality of certain claims and the dependence on specific conditions such as temperature and fuel-to-air ratios. There is also an acknowledgment of the need for deeper chemical insights that may not be fully addressed in engineering contexts.

Clausius2
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
7
As a future engineer, my proffessors teach us to be concerned about pollutant emissions. I always hear about NOx production inside heat engines and turbomachinery. But little is explained about the true nature of this problem.

Usually, we are told that NOx is produced at high temperatures, when Fuel to Air ratio is nearly stochiometric. I want the reasons of a chemicist about that. Why those conditions enhance NOx generation?. Which are the general conditions for NOx formation inside a combustion chamber?

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'll take a stab at this. Let's say you have oxygen and nitrogen present in an engine or something so you have the reaction

N2 + O2------>NOx


Inside an engine the temperature is really high so thermodynamically

G=H-TS. A higher temperature will lower delta G, meaning the reaction can occur spontaneously more easily. Kinetically, using the Arrhenius equation
K=Ae^-Ea/RT

you can see a larger temperature will increase the rate constant of the reaction.

Larger temperatures should push the reaction further thermodynamically and kinetically.
 
You're explanation makes sense. But is TOO general. It could be employable with several reactions. The NOx reactions seem to have a particular behavior when T is high enough and with stochiometric Fuel to Air ratio in spark plug engines. In fact, FAR approx 1 are avoided for that reason in spite of being the FAR of maximum indicated mean effective pressure. I have never heard the opinion of a chemicist about that. Usually engineers don't get into much depth when explaining it.

Thanks for trying it.
 
aO2 or fO2plotted as a function of "FAR" may prove illuminating --- activity/fugacity of oxygen (and excited species) is going to be low at rich conditions and high at lean burns. Low activity leads to low NOX production, and high to high.
 
Bystander said:
aO2 or fO2plotted as a function of "FAR" may prove illuminating --- activity/fugacity of oxygen (and excited species) is going to be low at rich conditions and high at lean burns. Low activity leads to low NOX production, and high to high.

That sound good, but I don't know what is "aO2 nor fO2".
 
Activity --- fugacity.
 
Activity --- fugacity. You can call it partial pressure (approximation) --- calculate it as if you had complete combustion for each FAR.
 
Simply put, N2, being fairly inert takes a large activation energy to react with anything, including oxygen. This activation is provided by high temperatures when the engine is throttled at heavy load conditions. At lower temperatures, the reaction rate between N2 and O2 is small compared to the rate at which CO2 is produced from combustion of the fuel. So, at lower temperatures CO2 (and also hydrocarbon, I think) emissions dominate.

I've heard that a slightly leaner than ideal (~15 to 17) A/F ratio produces most NOx. From the argument of activity (Bystander) a leaner ratio should result in more NOx, but I'm sure at a very lean mix, the NOx emissions go down. I believe this is because of the lower temperatures that are associated with increasingly leaner mixes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K