Answer: SHM: 45g Mass, .35m Amp - Speed Half Max Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vibrations Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the distance from equilibrium for a 45 g mass undergoing simple harmonic motion with a spring constant of 21 N/m and an amplitude of 0.3 m, where the speed is half its maximum velocity. The correct answer is confirmed to be 0.3 m, derived using the equation v = v_max * sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2)]. The participants validate the mathematical approach and confirm that the only viable answer is option A, as it is less than the amplitude of oscillation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Familiarity with spring constant (k) and mass (m) calculations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions in physics
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving velocity and displacement
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the maximum velocity in simple harmonic motion
  • Learn about the role of amplitude in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in SHM
  • Investigate the effects of varying spring constants on oscillation behavior
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering concepts related to simple harmonic motion and oscillatory systems.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
How far from equilibrium will a 45 g mass with amp. of .35 m for a spring (k = 21 N/m) undergoing simple harmonic motion have a speed that is half its maximum velocity?
a. .3 m
b. .45 m
c. .7 m
d. .92 m
e. 3.5 m

Choice B is wrong.

Use

v = v_max*sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]

Do I use k or m at all?
(1/2)v_max = v_max*sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]
Left with:

1/2 =sqrt[1 - (x^2/A^2 m)]

After plugging everything in and solving for x I get .303m (A.). Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay,let's take it this way.'A' is the only possible answer as it has the only figure less than the amplitude of oscillation.

Another rigurous mathematical justification would be:
[tex]x=A\sin\omega t[/tex](1)
[tex]v=\omega A\cos\omega t[/tex](2)
From (2) u get that for hamf of the maximum velocity the 'cos' must be 1/2,therefore the 'sin' would be [itex]\sqrt{3}/2[/itex].
Plug the sine into (1) and the "x" comes out to be [itex]0.175\sqrt{3}m[/itex]
,which can be (very roughly) approximated to 0.30m.

Daniel.
 


No, you are not wrong. The correct answer is indeed A. .3 m. The equation you used is correct, and by solving for x, you get the correct distance from equilibrium for the mass to have a speed that is half its maximum velocity. Good job!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
47K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K