New Reply

EL Equations for the modified electromagnetic field Lagrangian

 
Share Thread
Apr16-12, 10:51 AM   #1
 

EL Equations for the modified electromagnetic field Lagrangian


Hi,

I'm trying to work through something and it should be quite simple but somehow i've gotten a bit confused.

I've worked through the Euler Lagrange equations for the lagrangian:

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\mathcal{L}_{0} &= -\frac{1}{4}(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})(\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}) \\
&= \frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}
\end{align*}
[/tex]

getting:

[tex]\Box A_{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} = 0[/tex]

I'm ok with this.

Then considering the modified lagrangian:

[tex]\mathcal{L}_{\xi} = \mathcal{L}_{0} + \frac{\lambda}{2}(\partial_{\sigma}A^{\sigma})^2[/tex]

I'm trying to work out the EL equation components and as part of one of these calculations, I've to calculate:

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} \left[ \frac{\lambda}{2} (\partial_{\sigma}A^{\sigma})^2 \right]

&= \frac{\lambda}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A^{\sigma} ) ( \partial_{\rho}A^{\rho} ) \right] \\

&= \frac{\lambda}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} ) ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} \eta^{\rho \beta} ) \right] \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\rho \beta} \frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} ) ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \right] \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\rho \beta} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} ) \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \right) + \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu})} ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} ) \right) ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \right] \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\rho \beta} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} ) \delta^{\mu}_{\rho} \delta^{\nu}_{\beta} + \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} \delta^{\nu}_{\alpha} ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \right] \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\rho \beta} ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} ) \delta^{\mu}_{\rho} \delta^{\nu}_{\beta}
+
\frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\rho \beta} \delta^{\mu}_{\sigma} \delta^{\nu}_{\alpha} ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\sigma \alpha} \eta^{\mu \nu} ( \partial_{\sigma}A_{\alpha} )
+
\frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\mu \nu} \eta^{\rho \beta} ( \partial_{\rho}A_{\beta} ) \\

& = \frac{\lambda}{2} \eta^{\mu \nu} \left[ ( \partial_{\sigma}A^{\sigma} )
+
( \partial_{\rho}A^{\rho} ) \right] \\

& = \lambda \eta^{\mu \nu} ( \partial_{\sigma}A^{\sigma} ) \\

\end{align*}
[/tex]

Now I was hoping to get:

[tex]
\lambda \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}
[/tex]

as ultimately I need the EL equations to give me:

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{\xi}}{\partial A_{\nu}} - \partial_{\mu} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{\xi}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu})} \right)
&=\Box A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} ( \partial_{\mu} A^{\mu} ) - \lambda \partial^{\nu}(\partial_{\mu} A^{\mu}) \\
&= \Box A^{\nu} - ( 1 + \lambda ) \partial^{\nu} ( \partial_{\mu} A^{\mu} ) \\
&= 0
\end{align*}
[/tex]

Can anyone show me where i've gone wrong? I didn't stick this in the homework section as it's not homework. I'm just trying to work through the through missing steps from the text i'm reading.

Thanks in advance
PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Is there an invisible tug-of-war behind bad hearts and power outages?
>> Penetrating the quantum nature of magnetism
>> Rethinking the universe: Groundbreaking theory proposed in 1997 suggests a 'multiverse'
Apr16-12, 10:51 AM   #2
 
edit... now i'm finished stating the question.
Apr16-12, 04:20 PM   #3
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Irrational, You've got exactly what you need. Well, up to a minus sign anyway. You've got λ ημν(∂σAσ). So plug this into the Euler-Lagrange equation:
-∂μ(λ ημν(∂σAσ)) = -λ ∂ν(∂σAσ) = -λ ∂ν(∂μAμ)
Apr16-12, 04:54 PM   #4
 

EL Equations for the modified electromagnetic field Lagrangian


you have no idea how thick i feel right now. thanks for filling in the gap.
New Reply

Similar discussions for: EL Equations for the modified electromagnetic field Lagrangian
Thread Forum Replies
Lagrangian for electromagnetic field Classical Physics 2
electromagnetic lagrangian Advanced Physics Homework 1
Electromagnetic Lagrangian Advanced Physics Homework 3
electromagnetic lagrangian Classical Physics 1
Why is the Electromagnetic Field Tensor in the QED Lagrangian? Quantum Physics 5