New Reply

Divergence of a vector field

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr23-12, 09:52 PM   #1
 

Divergence of a vector field


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

F(x,y,z) = (-x+y)i + (y+z)j + (-z+x)k

Find divergence

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

The gradient is
-i + j + -k

Dotting that with F, I get

x - y + y + z + z - x
=
2z

My book lists the answer as -1. What the heck are they talking about? (they did not ask me to evaluate for any point)
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Apr23-12, 10:15 PM   #2

Homework Helper 2012
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by 1MileCrash View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

F(x,y,z) = (-x+y)i + (y+z)j + (-z+x)k

Find divergence

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

The gradient is
-i + j + -k

Dotting that with F, I get

x - y + y + z + z - x
=
2z

My book lists the answer as -1. What the heck are they talking about? (they did not ask me to evaluate for any point)
I think you are misunderstanding the definition of divergence. ∇.F doesn't mean grad(F).F. Look it up.
Apr23-12, 10:18 PM   #3
 
Quote by Dick View Post
I think you are misunderstanding the definition of divergence. ∇.F doesn't mean grad(F).F. Look it up.
I will, thanks!
Apr23-12, 10:19 PM   #4
 

Divergence of a vector field


Is it correct to say that it's like taking grad F, then adding up the resulting components for a scalar?
Apr23-12, 10:23 PM   #5

Homework Helper 2012
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by 1MileCrash View Post
Is it correct to say that it's like taking grad F, then adding up the resulting components for a scalar?
Yes, if F=(Fx,Fy,Fz) then the divergence of F is dFx/dx+dFy/dy+dFz/dz. It's a scalar.
Apr23-12, 10:36 PM   #6
 
I see my misunderstanding now. The del operator is not the gradient of anything in particular. It's just (d/dx)i + (d/dy)j + (d/dz)k. Dot product that with F leads to the correct definition.

This actually clears up a lot of the past notation. Since del is not a gradient of anything in particular, when we say [itex]\nabla f[/itex], since f is a scalar being multiplied by some vector, del, the result is a vector, which is the gradient of f.

Cool. :)
Apr23-12, 10:39 PM   #7

Homework Helper 2012
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by 1MileCrash View Post
I see my misunderstanding now. The del operator is not the gradient of anything in particular. It's just (d/dx)i + (d/dy)j + (d/dz)k. Dot product that with F leads to the correct definition.

This actually clears up a lot of the past notation. Since del is not a gradient of anything in particular, when we say [itex]\nabla f[/itex], since f is a scalar being multiplied by some vector, del, the result is a vector, which is the gradient of f.

Cool. :)
You've got it, I think. You just dotting the grad operator with the vector. The result is a scalar.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Divergence of a vector field
Thread Forum Replies
Just what does it mean when a vector field has 0 divergence? Introductory Physics Homework 9
divergence of a vector field Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
divergence of a vector field Calculus 0
Divergence of vector field Calculus 6
If the divergence of a vector field is zero... Calculus & Beyond Homework 5