Why Is Calculating Forces on a Truncated Cone's Surfaces Challenging?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating forces acting on the surfaces of a truncated cone, specifically a pond shaped like an inverted cone with a depth of 5.00m. Participants are exploring the relationship between the pressures at the top and bottom surfaces, as well as the geometric implications of the cone's dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to set up equations based on the forces and pressures acting on the top and bottom surfaces of the truncated cone. There is confusion regarding the relationship between the pressures and the areas of the surfaces. Some participants are questioning the use of the volume of the cone and the relevance of the 60-degree angle in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to apply geometric principles, particularly in relation to the 60-degree angle and the definition of tangent. However, there is still a lack of clarity among participants about how to effectively use these concepts to solve for the unknown dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the problem's setup, including the assumption that the pressures at the top and bottom surfaces are equal, which has been challenged. There is also mention of the need to understand geometric relationships to progress in the problem.

NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Ahhh Double Star Question...AGAIN!

I think my prof really doesn't like us or maybe he simply has an over expectation of our abilities...

As the drawing shows (attached), a pond has the shape of an inverted cone with the top sliced off and has a depth of 5.00m. The atmospheric pressure is 1.01 x 10^5 PA. The circular top surface (radius=R2) and circular bottom surface (radius=R1) of the pond are both parallel to the ground. The magnitude of the force acting on the top surface is the same as the manitude of the force acting on the bottom surface. Obtain a)R2 and b)R1.

Okay, this looks like the question involving two equations of two unknowns. First I know that F1=F2... So P1A=P2A. The other I believe might have to do with the volume of this pond. A normal cone would have a volume of 1/3pie x r^2 x h. But since this is a cut-off cone, I'm lost here. Also, that 60 degrees is quite confusing. I think it may have to do with the area of the middle section when unfolded, a trapezoid shape perhaps? Any Ideas appreciated!
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • cylinderprof.JPG
    cylinderprof.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 584
Physics news on Phys.org
*bump* Anyone?
 
1.Compute the 2 forces and set them equal.Show your work.

Daniel.
 
ok, so P2 is simply atmospheric pressure which is
1.01 x 10^5. P1 can be found by P2=P1+pgh. That turns out to be pretty much the same as P2, so 1.01 x 10^5. Ok so the pressures P2=P1. Area is pie x r1^2 and pie x r2^2. Ok in terms of force:

F=PA
so P2 x (pie x r2^2)= P1 x (pie x r1^2). Since pie and Pressures are virtually the same, I can cancel them out. So I have r1^2=r2^2 which doesn't make any sense.
 
Of course it doesn't.The pressures are DIFFERENT.U can't take them as equal.This is a trick in the problem...


Daniel.

P.S.Post your work again...
 
P2 x (pie x r2^2)= P1 x (pie x r1^2). <---oK is this at least right? P1 has to be found using this formula, P2=P1+pgh. The pressure at the bottom will definitely be bigger than the top, but only by a factor of pgh, which is 49050. So P1= 1.50 x 10^5 Pa. Ok, now I have the two, now solve for one of the r's. ERR, what's the other equation! I think it may be the volume, some help.
 
U don't need the volume.You need to apply the definition of 'tangent'.Think of the rightangle triangle in that trapese.And use the fact that u know ine side of the triangle (namely the height of the trapese) and one angle in the triangle (which is found by using that 60° which the problem gives you).

Daniel.
 
Yes, I thought that the 60 degrees could be used when you slice the cone in half you get a trapezoid. Maybe I could find the length of one the top or bottom and that would be the circumference. and C=2pie x r. r =C/2pie. I can see how the 60 degrees can be used to find the hypoteneuse and the base but I still can't get the either lengths no matter how many little triangles I cut the thing into...
 
I just can't seem to get it. HELP
 
  • #10
BUMP! I'm still getting no where...
 
  • #11
You don't know geometry,if u can't prove this formula
[tex]\tan 30°=\frac{R_{2}-R_{1}}{h}[/tex]

Then if u don't know geometry,how do u expect solving physics problems?? :rolleyes:

Daniel.
 
  • #12
I did that from the start, but didn't realize that I could simply go R2-R1 and use that as my second equation. I thought I could find an actual number from the 60 degrees..Ah well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
5K