Register to reply

Atomic 'magic' numbers.

by center o bass
Tags: atomic, magic, numbers
Share this thread:
center o bass
May5-12, 08:28 AM
P: 471
I'm currently reading about nuclear and particle physics in B.R.Martins 'An introduction to nuclear and particle physics'.

In chapter 7.3 he introduces the shell model of the nucleus and draws an analogy to the periodic table and how we think of it being constructed of progressively placing more and more electrons in 'orbitals' given by the quantum numbers n,l and ml.

From the study of the hydrogen atom we know that the energy levels are degenerate with 2n^2. Martin further notes that if a shell or a subshell is filled then

[tex]\sum m_s = \sum m_l = 0[/tex]
which implies that
[tex]\vec L = \vec S = 0 = \vec J = \vec L + \vec S.[/tex]
He then states that 'For any atom with a closed shell or a closed sub-shell, the electrons are paired off and thus no valence electrons are avaiable. Such atoms are therefore chemically inert. It is straight forward to work out the atomic numbers at which this occurs. These are

[tex]Z = 2,10,18,36,54.[/tex]'

But I do not understand how these numbers are obtained. If one follows the 'hydrogen model' I would think that the numbers at which we have a closed shell or subshell would be

[tex] Z = 2,4,10,12,18,28, \ldots[/tex]

corresponding to the electron configurations

[tex] 1s^2, 1s^2 2s^2, 1s^2 2s^2 2p^6,1s^2 2s^2 2p^63s^2, \ldots[/tex]

What have I missunderstood here?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Symphony of nanoplasmonic and optical resonators produces laser-like light emission
Do we live in a 2-D hologram? New Fermilab experiment will test the nature of the universe
Duality principle is 'safe and sound': Researchers clear up apparent violation of wave-particle duality
May5-12, 03:26 PM
P: 11,869
The strong interaction in a nucleus is a bit different from the hydrogen atom. There, electrons have a potential given by other particles (the nucleus), with an 1/r^2-law. This is not true for the strong interaction, where the interaction is short-ranged and given by other nucleons in the same volume. As a result, the energy levels depend heavily on the quantum states, and you get a nice mess with different magic numbers.
center o bass
May8-12, 04:36 AM
P: 471
But how, then, can it be that

It is straight forward to work out the atomic numbers at which this occurs
Can these be calculated within a theoretical framework?

May8-12, 01:18 PM
P: 11,869
Atomic 'magic' numbers.

You can work out these numbers if you know the energy levels.
Calculating these energy levels (numerically) is not so easy, but it is possible.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Deriving fractional atomic coordination numbers Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Quantum physics underlining the 'magic numbers' in chemical bonding & more. Quantum Physics 1
Magic Squares/Magic Constant Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Atomic terms and quantum numbers? Advanced Physics Homework 2
Magic numbers and elementary particles General Physics 0