Huygens & non-orbital re-entry speed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Huygens Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the re-entry dynamics of the Huygens probe and the theoretical implications of non-orbital re-entry speeds for Earth-based vehicles. Participants explore the differences in entry angles, velocities, and the potential for safe landings from various heights, considering both aerodynamics and gravitational effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Huygens entered the atmosphere more vertically compared to Earth re-entry vehicles, suggesting this could allow for a slower descent and less need for aerobraking.
  • Another participant calculates the escape velocity for Earth and mentions that the approach velocity for Huygens would be higher due to its journey from Earth, implying a more complex re-entry scenario.
  • A participant requests distance values rather than velocity values to better understand the height needed for a straight drop to reach Mach 25 upon entering the atmosphere.
  • One participant presents a formula relating velocity and gravitational potential energy, suggesting that if the drop height were infinite, the velocity could approach escape velocity, and estimates the height needed for a Mach 25 entry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessary height for safe re-entry and the implications of velocity versus distance. There is no consensus on specific values or methods for calculating these parameters.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about atmospheric effects, gravitational influences, and the idealized nature of the scenarios presented. Specific mathematical steps and definitions are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrodynamics, atmospheric entry physics, and the engineering challenges of spacecraft re-entry may find this discussion relevant.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,551
Reaction score
8,868
So, I notice in the animations of Huygens, they seem to suggest the probe enters the atmosphere more or less vertically, as opposed to almost horizontally, as in the case of re-entry of Earth-based vehicles. While I grant the the animations are idealized, I thought that perhaps it might be possibly be doable.

Earth re-entry vehicles must decelerate from Mach25+, a velocity they needed to reach to reach in orbit in the first place. But Huygens was not in orbit, and theoretically could have made a relatively slow planetfall, thus it might not have need a huge aerobraking phase.

And then while watching another venerable science-fact show, Futurama, I saw Bender fall straight to Earth, and I thought to myself:

(self, I thought...)

How high above Earth would one have to start, to reach Mach 25 by the time one reached the outer atmosphere, if one were plunging straight down under gravity?

Or, alternately,

How high could one start from and still survive a direct, falling entry into the atmosphere? For this, we must assume some point in the descent when it can supposedly switch to conventional touchdown procedures, such as gliding or parachuting. I understand that Huygens was going about Mach 1.5 when it deployed its shute for a soft landing. We must aslo guess at the aerobraking effct of the atmosphere over only a hundred kilometres or so.

Any guesses?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The escape velocity is [tex]\sqrt {2}[/tex] times the orbital velocity, so that is even more. I get V_escape for the Earth:

[tex]V_e = \sqrt {2 \mu /r} = \sqrt{\frac {2 \times 4E14} {6.3E6 }} =[/tex]

11000 m/sec.

For Saturn [tex]\mu[/tex] is much greater and there is an additional velocity coming from the trip from Earth so the approach velocity to the top of the atmosphere will be far higher.
There are some pretty smart guys in the astrodynamics threads who you can get a real education from. See https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=69
 
Last edited:
Um. Appreciate all the effort, but. Meaningful answers to my questions would be distance values, not velocity values.
 
I have a formula:
(V^2)/2=GM (1/r1 - 1/r2)
Let GM be the constant for the Earth.
r1 is the height of the top of the atmosphere from the center of the Earth.
r2 is the drop height.
If R2 was infinite then V would be about 25000 mph. (the excape velocity)
Mach 25 I guess is 800 mph X 25 = 20000 mph.
So your drop height would be a pretty good distance out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K