New Reply

Where do I start with self learning linear algebra

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May12-12, 03:19 AM   #1
 

Where do I start with self learning linear algebra


Hi. Im a physics major and Id probably go with mathematical/theoretical physics path.

Where do I start with self learning linear algebra? I'm good with proofs but I'm not comfortable with learning math without intuition or motivation behind the axioms. Still, I hate math without rigor (cookbook engineer math).

I'm looking for an intro book for linear algebra. Thanks. May be my first exposure to pure math excluding intro to proofs.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> 'Whodunnit' of Irish potato famine solved
>> The mammoth's lament: Study shows how cosmic impact sparked devastating climate change
>> Curiosity Mars rover drills second rock target
May12-12, 06:39 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Try to get "linear algebra" by Serge Lang. It's an excellent book to study from.

Another good book is "linear algebra" by Friedberg, Insel and Spence.
 
May12-12, 08:04 AM   #3
 
Very nice intuitive approach to algebra provides Meyer's Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra. It is great for intuition but as the title indicates, it is far from being a rigorous mathematical text.
 
May12-12, 10:32 AM   #4
 

Where do I start with self learning linear algebra


Hi micromass. Which edition should I get?
 
May12-12, 10:37 AM   #5
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Headacheguy View Post
Hi micromass. Which edition should I get?
Doesn't matter. If you can find a cheap old edition, then it'll probably be fine.
 
May12-12, 11:01 AM   #6
 
Thanks!! As I've said, this is my first exposure to pure math. Is it okay if I can't at first answer the exercises? That is, can I skip the hard exercises? This happened a lot in Spivak and I just gave up on the book. Kind of a downer.
 
May12-12, 11:13 AM   #7
 
I'm no expert but... If I were to buy a textbook to self-study from, I would check a homework-help site like Cramster and see whether that book is covered. Since you won't have anyone to really help you with the problems, having Cramster go over problems step-by-step can help a lot.
 
May12-12, 11:34 AM   #8
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Headacheguy View Post
Thanks!! As I've said, this is my first exposure to pure math. Is it okay if I can't at first answer the exercises? That is, can I skip the hard exercises? This happened a lot in Spivak and I just gave up on the book. Kind of a downer.
Was Spivak your first encounter to calculus?? It really shouldn't be the first calc book you study. It's more something like a second exposure to calculus/intro real analysis book.

It's ok to skip the hard exercises, but you should try them nevertheless. Ask for help if you really can't do them. This forum has a lot of opportunities for help.
 
May12-12, 11:54 AM   #9
 
Yes it was. I hope Lang's would be different. And its been a year since my first dreadful take on Spivak.
 
May12-12, 11:56 AM   #10
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Headacheguy View Post
Yes it was. I hope Lang's would be different. And its been a year since my first dreadful take on Spivak.
I take it, that it's your first encounter with linear algebra as well?? That is: do you know something about matrices, determinants and linear systems?? If you don't know anything about them, then perhaps another book would be good. Meyers book, mentioned earlier here, would be a nice first book.
 
May12-12, 12:03 PM   #11
 
Hey micro, since I've got your attention, I'd like to ask some more. I'm trying to get as good an education in math as I can cause its fun and exciting and I need it. I wouldn't be able to take any course in math (besides math methods, which isn't really math).

I've taken pre calc and methods single variable calculus. I'll be taking a course on DE on November. The class will consist only of physics majors - so It would probably be non-mathy.

Right now my plan is to learn linear algebra and will relearn calculus with Spivak and then use Fleming of Spivak on Manifolds for several variable calculus. Would this be okay for a physics major self-learning math?

Might be the case that all this math theory would be useless in physics. Still, I get the feeling that if I'd be using math, then, at least I should use it properly.
 
May12-12, 12:07 PM   #12
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Whether it is enough highly depends on what kind of physics you want to do. For example, if you want to study general relativity, then courses on topology and differential geometry would also help. If you want to study quantum mechanics rigorously, then courses on functional analysis would be good.

So if you know what kind of physics you want to do, only then can we say what math you need.
 
May12-12, 12:09 PM   #13
 
Ugh, yes. I don't know anything about matrices and stuff. What a waste.. I found Lang to be quite entertaining. And the Mayer book is large.
 
May12-12, 12:11 PM   #14
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Headacheguy View Post
Ugh, yes. I don't know anything about matrices and stuff. What a waste.. I found Lang to be quite entertaining. And the Mayer book is large.
You can always get Schaum's outline on linear algebra. It's usually easy with lots of nice exercises. I think that would be a nice first exposure.
 
May12-12, 12:12 PM   #15
 
I mean, for now as an undergraduate, without any particular field in mind, i.e. the maths that all physics majors (who will probably go with theory) should know.
 
May12-12, 12:14 PM   #16
 
Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by Headacheguy View Post
I mean, for now as an undergraduate, without any particular field in mind, i.e. the maths that all physics majors (who will probably go with theory) should know.
Calculus (single-variable and multi-variable), ODE's, PDE's and linear algebra. That seems to be the bare minimum.

Try to get hold of Boas "mathematics mathods in the physical sciences". It might be nonrigorous but it's an excellent book and contains everything a physics major should know.
 
May12-12, 12:25 PM   #17
 
Okay, thanks, micromass. Guess I'll first study the Boas book to get a feel for the maths.
 
New Reply

Tags
math, reference-request
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Where do I start with self learning linear algebra
Thread Forum Replies
Where to start learning more about and start building interest in EE? Electrical Engineering 16
What are the prerequisites for learning Linear Algebra? Linear & Abstract Algebra 6
Resources for learning how to do proofs Linear algebra Linear & Abstract Algebra 2
Do I need a lot of abstract algebra knowledge to start learning Lie algebra Academic Guidance 9
Linear Algebra: need suggestions for learning Linear & Abstract Algebra 5