Why Does a Series Circuit Show Zero Potential Difference Despite Components?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a series circuit involving a resistor, capacitor, and inductor, where participants explore the potential difference between two points in the circuit at a specific moment in time. The original poster presents a calculation that results in a zero potential difference, prompting questions about the implications of this result in the context of energy loss in circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the calculation of potential difference using Ohm's law and question the validity of the result indicating zero potential difference. Some express confusion about the implications of this result regarding energy loss in the circuit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and reasoning. Some suggest that the zero potential difference is a momentary condition, while others emphasize the need to consider the behavior of the circuit over time. There is a mix of agreement and differing viewpoints on the implications of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of components in a series circuit and the nature of potential differences in alternating current scenarios. There is a focus on the momentary state of the circuit and the assumptions underlying the calculations.

bulbanos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking while studying physics and came up with the following problem:

A current I, starting at a point A, flows through a resistor with R=25 kΩ, a capacitor with C=4milliF, and an inductor with L=7 Henry to finish in point B. At a time when Q=8 milliC and the current I=0.2 milliAmps and is changing at a rate dI/dt=-1.0 A/s, what is the potential difference VB-VA (inVolts)?

Solution: Moving in the direction of the current flow we have
VB-VA=-IR-Q/C-L dI/dt
IR =5 V
Q/C = 2 V
L dI/dt = -7 V

Thus, VB-VA = -5V -2V +7V = 0V (?)

how is this possible? There must be some loss due to the resistor, otherwise we could be able to make perfect circuits with no losses due to household devices for example.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The results seem good,as long as the initial equation (the Ohm's law) is correct,regarding the signs...
The tension varies sinusoidally (damped,c'est vrai) and it passes through zero many times,and there's no surprise...

For the second part,i didn't get your reasoning...What are u talking about...?

Daniel.
 
I conclude from my calculations that the potential drop is 0V, so the power dissipated is I.V=0 W and there are no losses of energy.
 
Yes,but that's happening at a moment of time,not an interval...

Daniel.
 
what's so characteristic about that single moment of time?
 
Well,nothing really,just the fact that at that moment of time,the potential difference between the ends of the circuit is zero...Didn't u ever see graphs of intensity or potential difference in alternative current?? :rolleyes:

Daniel.
 
bulbanos said:
I've been thinking while studying physics and came up with the following problem:

A current I, starting at a point A, flows through a resistor with R=25 kΩ, a capacitor with C=4milliF, and an inductor with L=7 Henry to finish in point B. At a time when Q=8 milliC and the current I=0.2 milliAmps and is changing at a rate dI/dt=-1.0 A/s, what is the potential difference VB-VA (inVolts)?

Solution: Moving in the direction of the current flow we have
VB-VA=-IR-Q/C-L dI/dt
IR =5 V
Q/C = 2 V
L dI/dt = -7 V

Thus, VB-VA = -5V -2V +7V = 0V (?)

how is this possible? There must be some loss due to the resistor, otherwise we could be able to make perfect circuits with no losses due to household devices for example.

This correct and you need to look at it like this : the potential difference is zero initially, because given your specifications, the self induced emf and the decrease of i is just big enough to cancel any potential differences in this chain. But ofcourse, you need to realize that in the very "beginning" there was a potential difference in A and B because otherwise the current cannot flow. When the current has passed the induced emf of the coil, that's when the potential difference evolves to zero. If you were to look at this chain a little bit later, you shall see that the influence of the inductor is just that of an ordinary conducting wire. One can prove that by solving the differential equation for i. this equation comes from the loop-rule which is a mere manifestation of conservation of energy. But this result has nothing to do with the fact that the solution for i passes through zero many times (which it does ofcourse). However this solution is valid for a certain time-interval, NOT just one moment. Once the inductor starts acting like a wire, this solution is useless. You can calculate this time-periode based upon the formula for the decay of the current

regards
marlon

ps : why are you not in my lessons victor ??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K