Equipotential Contours and Point Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the value of a charge based on equipotential contours associated with a point charge at the origin. Participants are exploring the relationship between voltage, charge, and distance in the context of electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to use the equation V = kQ/r to find the charge, but there is uncertainty about the values being used, particularly the voltage and the radius. Some participants question the need for the Pythagorean theorem to determine the radius of the equipotential contours.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the correct application of the formula and the values involved. Some participants have offered guidance on checking calculations and interpreting the graph, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the topic has not been covered in class, and there is a sense of urgency as the homework is due soon. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the sign of the charge and the interpretation of the graph.

GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
We haven't really covered this in class so I need some help.

Assuming that these contours are those of a point charge at the origin, calculate the value of the charge in C.

I tried using the equation kQ/R but that's wrong, I'm not even sure I'm using it right in fact. Any help? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • prob01av2.gif
    prob01av2.gif
    7.6 KB · Views: 710
Physics news on Phys.org
your equation is completely fine... check your number... Maybe your calculator needs a new battery... :-p
 
My calculator is just fine thanks, but I'm still getting it wrong. I'm using -7500 V as Q and then figuring out the radius by using the pythagoream theaorem, still getting it wrong. Help
 
Why are you using pythagorean theorem? Each contour is a circle... you can measure R right off the graph... You can use any contour, but I'd use the one at R=1m.
 
Well both the x and y-axis measure distance so i thought i'd have to find the radius of the circle by using the pythagoream theorem. Even by using r=1m i still get it wrong. :mad:
 
write your number out and let us check for you...
warning: what is the sign of charge?
 
kQ/r=[(8.99e9 Nm^2/C^2)*(-7500 V)]/sqrt(.8^2+1.0^2)=-5.265e13. Is this completely wrong lol. We haven't covered it in class, and incidentally the homework is due tomorrow (my only problem left!), and our book seriously does not help.
 
V=kQ/r
V is the voltage, and Q is the unknown charge you need to find...You mess up these two numbers
you don't need the pythagoream therom to get the r, look carefully, the radii of the circle is same as the number @ x-axis
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K