Proving a Sum of Powers of Integers: A Challenge!

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a formula for the sum of the fourth powers of integers, specifically the expression \(\sum_{n=1}^n i^4 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2 + 3n - 1)}{30}\). Participants are exploring the algebraic manipulation and verification of this formula.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to prove the formula using mathematical induction, starting with base cases and assuming the formula holds for \(n=k\) to derive it for \(n=k+1\). There are discussions about simplifying expressions by factoring and multiplying out terms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and suggestions for simplifying the algebraic expressions involved. Others have noted the complexity of the algebra and have shared their attempts at rearranging terms. There is an acknowledgment of potential mistakes in calculations, and multiple interpretations of the approach are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the extent of direct assistance. There is an emphasis on understanding the polynomial nature of the expression and verifying it through various methods, including substitution and polynomial division.

gazzo
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Hey!

Can someone please give me a hint on this :rolleyes:

Prove:
[tex] \sum_{n=1}^n i^4 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2 + 3n - 1)}{30}[/tex]

What I've got so far:

Let [itex]P(n)[/itex] be the statement:
[tex] \sum_{n=1}^n i^4 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2 + 3n - 1)}{30}[/tex]

Let [itex]n=1[/itex] we get;
[tex] \sum_{n=1}^1 i^4 = \frac{1(1+1)(2(1)+1)(3(1^2) + 31 - 1)}{30}<br /> = \frac{(2)(3)(5)}{30}<br /> = 1 [/tex]
Which is true.

Assume [itex]P(n)[/itex] is true [itex]\forall k \ge n, k \in\mathbb{Z}[/itex]
Let [itex]n=k+1[/itex]

Then we get:
[tex] P(k+1) = \sum_{n=1}^{k+1} i^4 = \bigg( \sum_{n=1}^{k} i^4 \bigg) + (k+1)^4 = \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)(3k^2 + 3k - 1)}{30} + (k+1)^4<br /> = \frac{1}{30} \bigg[ k(k+1)(2k+1)(3k^2+3k-1) + 30(k+1)^4 \bigg][/tex]

and then i tried
[tex] \frac{1}{30} \bigg[ k(k+1)(2k+1)(3k^2+3k-1) + 30(k+1)^4 \bigg] = \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ k(2k+1)(3k^2+3k-1) + 30(k+1)^3 \bigg][/tex]

A well as heaps of other arrangements :frown: :cry: My algebra sucks. It turns into a giant mess!
These sorts of things seem to require a lot of intuition. (or, what's that word... practice?)

Thank you very much! :redface: :redface: :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good! Factoring out (k+1) simplifies it. I'm afraid what you are going to have to do now is actually multiply that out:
multiply (2k)(2k+1)(3k2+ 3k- 1) multiply 30(k+1)3 and add them
Now factor that. It may help to know that you WANT (since you have already factored out (k+1) (which corresponds to the "n" in the original formula) (k+2)(2k+3)(3k2+ 9k+ 5) which correspond, respectively, to n+1, 2n+1, and 3n2+ 3n-1 with k+1 in place of n.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy :smile:

Hmm...

[tex]\frac{1}{30} \bigg[ k(k+1)(2k+1)(3k^2+3k-1) + 30(k+1)^4 \bigg] = \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ k(2k+1)(3k^2+3k-1) + 30(k+1)^3 \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ k(6k^3 + 6k^2 - 2k + 3k^2 + 3k - 1) + 30(k+1)^3 \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ k(6k^3+9k^2+k-1) + 30(k+1)^3 \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + 30(k+1)^3 \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + 30(k+1)(k^2+2k+1) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + 30(k^3+2k^2+k+k^2+2k+1) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + (30k^3+60k^2+30k+30k^2+60k+30) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + (30k^3+90k^2+90k+30) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ (6k^4+9k^3+k^2-k) + (30k^3+90k^2+90k+30) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ 6k^4+39k^3+90k^2+90k+30 \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ 3k(2k^3+13k^2) + 30(3k^2+3k+1) \bigg][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ 3k(2k^3+13k^2) + 30(3k(k+1)+1) \bigg][/tex]

ack!

i tried getting it to look something like err at least..

[tex]\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2 + 3n - 1)}{30} = \frac{(2n^2+3n+1)(3n^2+3n-1)}{30}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{6n^4+3n^3-2n^2+9n^3+9n^2-3n+3n^2+3n-1}{30}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{6n^4+12n^3+10n^2-1}{30}[/tex]

Which, where [itex]n=k[/itex] :

[tex]\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2 + 3n - 1)}{30} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)(3k^2+9k+5)}{30}[/tex]

:shy:
 
It might help to multiply it out before doing anything. In other words, prove the statement in its non-factored form.

There's also a cheap trick you can use. :biggrin: If, for some reason, you know that the answer is a polynomial of degree 5, then you can just try 6 values of n and check you get the right answer. (given (k+1) input-output pairs, there is exactly one degree k polynomial passing through them)
 
gazzo said:
[tex]= \frac{k+1}{30} \bigg[ 6k^4+39k^3+90k^2+90k+30 \bigg][/tex]

There's a mistake above... it should be 91k^2 and 89k.

I think Hurkyl's method of multiplying out what you're trying to prove...(k+2)(2k+3) etc... and showing that it's the same as the above polynomial is the best way.

If you want to factor your above polynomial ... then since you "expect" (k+2), and (2k+3) as factors... plug in -2 into the polynomial above to see that it goes to zero. That proves that k+2 is a factor. Also try pluggin in k=-3/2 proves that 2k+3 is a factor ince 2k+3= 2(k+3/2).

You can do polynomial division then to get the last factor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K