How Do Solids Defy Rutherford's Theory of Atoms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solids
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of how solids can maintain their structural integrity despite Rutherford's theory that atoms are mostly empty space. Participants explore the implications of atomic structure and forces at play in solids, including the nature of contact forces and atomic interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the relative distance between atoms and molecules, along with intermolecular bonds, is crucial in distinguishing solids from gases.
  • One participant suggests that while atoms are mostly empty space, the charged particles within them and the Coulomb forces prevent atoms from getting too close, similar to the repulsion between like poles of magnets.
  • Another participant explains that contact forces, such as friction and the normal force, are electromagnetic in nature, preventing objects from occupying the same space and thus allowing solids to support weight.
  • There is a participant expressing confusion about the concepts discussed, indicating a lack of clarity in the explanations provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of atomic interactions and the forces that allow solids to maintain their structure. No consensus is reached, and multiple competing views remain regarding the explanation of how solids function under the principles of atomic theory.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities of atomic interactions and the definitions of forces involved, leaving several assumptions and nuances unaddressed.

Roxy
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Rutherford's idea that atoms are mostly empty space is retained in all subsequent atomic theories. So, how can solids be solids? How can a chair support you, why don't you fall through.

Is it because the atoms are so close together??
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Relative distance between atoms/molecules wrt atomic/molecular sizes and intermolecular bonds are decisive.

From this perspective,e.g. the solide state is fundamentally different from the gaseous one.

Daniel.
 
Roxy said:
Rutherford's idea that atoms are mostly empty space is retained in all subsequent atomic theories. So, how can solids be solids? How can a chair support you, why don't you fall through.

Is it because the atoms are so close together??

While there is a lot of space between atoms, they are built out of the charged particles; Coulomb forces don't allow them to get to close one to each other. In general it is similar effect to that of two strong magnets - if taken S to S or N to N they are difficult to press together, even if there is nothing between them.


Chemical calculators for labs and education
BATE - pH calculations, titration curves, hydrolisis
 
I don't get it :(
 
All forces that are classified as "contact" forces, i.e. forces that involve interaction between matter (such as your butt and the surface of the chair), forces like friction, the "normal" force that keeps you from falling through the floor, the chemical forces that bind molecules together, the force of impact between two colliding billiard balls et cetera...all of these forces are electromagnetic in nature. They are due to electromagnetic interactions between the particles that make up the matter in question. You can't pass your hand straight through a wall, because then atoms in your hand would be trying to occupy the same space as atoms in the wall, and so one or the other would have to move...instead the atoms mutually repel each other. With fluids, the atoms are not tightly held in some sort of rigid structure (as in solids) that requires a huge force to break. Instead, they can move, and are easily displaced as your hand passes through the substance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K