Register to reply

Calculating diffraction patterns

by Gobil
Tags: diffraction, patterns
Share this thread:
Gobil
#1
Jan10-13, 08:37 AM
P: 59
hi All,

I recently got interested in a general solution to diffraction from an object at verious distance and wavelengths. I came across the Fresnel Kirchoff formula (attached formula from Schnars, digital holography).

My problem is I cannot seem to replicate a diffraction that makes sense to me from this formula. My approach is to calculate numerically the terms inside the double integral, then integrate in x and y, and display the magnitude squared. If I try this with a square aperture centered in a opaque screen, I get something that looks like the image attached.

Am I doing something basic wrong?

Thanks in advance!
Attached Thumbnails
Schnars.png   square_apt.png  
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers demonstrate ultra low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using Earth's magnetic field
Bubbling down: Discovery suggests surprising uses for common bubbles
New non-metallic metamaterial enables team to 'compress' and contain light
sophiecentaur
#2
Jan10-13, 10:39 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
sophiecentaur's Avatar
P: 12,130
Itg strikes me that you need to start with a very simple situation and aim at getting what you can predict analytically with your numerical method. You have probably made some simple error in your coding which you will either have to find by re-examining in detail or by breaking the problem down into individual steps. If your aperture just consists of a top hat function in one dimension then you would expect a sin(x)/x pattern, for instance.
Scaling could be a problem, too - dimensions in wavelengths etc.
jtbell
#3
Jan10-13, 10:46 AM
Mentor
jtbell's Avatar
P: 11,738
To check your results, try to compare them against this applet for Fresnel diffraction:

http://www.falstad.com/diffraction/

One of the source options is a square aperture.

Gobil
#4
Jan10-13, 10:52 AM
P: 59
Calculating diffraction patterns

ok, thanks jtbell, the applet is useful, as you can see from my image, it looks like Im just getting one corner of the actual diffraction pattern, which I dont understand very well. I did read somewhere when doing Fourier transforms you get a one sided spectrum and have to reflect it, but Im not entirely clear on why this is.

Any more info welcome!
Gobil
#5
Jan10-13, 01:55 PM
P: 59
hmm, after much fiddling around Im pretty sure Im putting in the right values, but for the diffraction pattern of a square aperture is the image you see below, which seems like one quarter of the real image or something like that.

any ideas?
Attached Thumbnails
square_apt_2.png  


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Diffraction patterns Introductory Physics Homework 4
Causes of Diffraction Patterns General Physics 6
Calculating Wavelength with grating, single, and double slit diffraction patterns Introductory Physics Homework 10
Diffraction Patterns Question Introductory Physics Homework 0
Diffraction patterns Classical Physics 13