What are the Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions for the Operator \hat{Q}?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter broegger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for the operator \(\hat{Q} = \frac{d^2}{d\phi^2}\), where \(\phi\) is the azimuthal angle. Participants explore the mathematical properties of the operator, including the periodicity of eigenfunctions and the implications for eigenvalues, while addressing the concept of degeneracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the eigenfunctions are complex exponentials and suggest that the eigenvalues could be 0, -1, -2, etc., but express uncertainty about this.
  • One participant asserts that the numbers -1, 0, 1, 2, ... are quantum numbers rather than eigenvalues, emphasizing the need for integer values.
  • Another participant suggests solving the differential equation while considering the periodicity condition, indicating a methodical approach to finding eigenvalues.
  • A participant presents a solution attempt, deriving eigenvalues from negative eigenvalues and periodicity, concluding with eigenvalues of 0, -1, -4, -9, etc.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of eigenvalues, with one participant questioning the need for square roots in the characteristic equation.
  • Some participants note that the eigenvalues need not be real initially, but periodicity implies they must be real, leading to a discussion about the implications of Hermiticity on the eigenvalues.
  • One participant acknowledges an oversight regarding Hermiticity and agrees that eigenvalues must be nonnegative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and values of the eigenvalues, with no consensus reached on the exact values. Some agree on the necessity of periodicity and Hermiticity, while others remain uncertain about the implications of these conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the implications of periodicity and Hermiticity on eigenvalues. There is also ambiguity regarding the classification of eigenvalues as real or complex.

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
I having trouble finding the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for the operator

[tex]\hat{Q} = \frac{d^2}{d\phi^2},[/tex]​

where [tex]\phi[/tex] is the azimuthal angle. The eigenfunctions are periodical,

[tex]f(\phi) = f(\phi + 2\pi),[/tex]​

which I think should put some restrictions on the eigenvalues.

I think that the eigenfunctions are complex exponentials, and that the eigenvalues are 0,-1,-2,..., but I am not sure if this is correct. Also I have to determine if the spectrum is degenerate, that is, if two (or more) distinct eigenfunctions correspond to the same eigenvalue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right about the complex exponentials and wrong about the eigenvalues, but finding the e-values isn't hard, just substitute a complex exponential into the equation and see what happens. :smile:

Those numbers ...-1, 0, 1, 2, ... do parametrize the equation - they turn out to be quantum numbers, not eigenvalues. Make sure you understand why they have to be integers.

Degeneracy should follow from what the eigenvalues look like, so calculate them first.

Kane
 
[tex]\frac{d^2 f}{d\phi^2} = Af[/tex]

Where A is an eigenvalue. Now solve this diff equation and make a clear distinction between A positive and negative. Also keep in mind that the eigenfunctions need to be periodical.

marlon
 
Okay.Better solve the ODE and then impose the periodicity condition.

Daniel.
 
This is my solution-attempt:

For negative eigenvalues we have:

[tex]f(\phi) = e^{-iq\phi}[/tex]​

This correspond to eigenvalues [tex]\lambda = -q^2[/tex]. Since [tex]f(\phi)[/tex] is [tex]2\pi[/tex]-periodical we have:

[tex]1 = e^{-iq2\pi}.[/tex]​

This implies that [tex]q = 0, \pm1, \pm2, \ldots[/tex], which again implies that the eigenvalues are [tex]\lambda = 0, -1, -4, -9, \ldots[/tex]. There are no positive eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
Are u sure...?
[tex]\frac{d^{2}f(\varphi)}{d\varphi^{2}}=\lambda f(\varphi)[/tex]

I'm getting some square roots...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Are u sure...?

No, I'm not sure, not at all :biggrin:

From where do you get the square roots? If you differentiate twice you get [tex](-iq)^2 = -q^2[/tex]?
 
??Well,the characteristic equation is
[tex]r^{2}=\lambda[/tex]

,with the solutions:
[tex]r_{1,2}=\pm \sqrt\lambda[/tex]

Daniel.
 
I don't get it :( What do you get for the eigenvalues exactly?
 
  • #10
The eigenvalues need not be real a a priori, but the periodicity implies it.

Since at first the eigenvalue lambda can be anything at all, best let [itex]\lambda = -m^2[/itex], where [itex]m[/itex] can be any complex number.
 
  • #11
[tex]\hat{Q}[/tex] is hermitian, so the eigenvalues must be real - isn't that correct? If we apply the condition [tex]\lambda = -m^2[/tex], we get the eigenvalues 0, 1, 4, 9,... since the periodicity implies that [tex]m = 0, \pm1, \pm2,...[/tex] Right?
 
  • #12
broegger said:
[tex]\hat{Q}[/tex] is hermitian, so the eigenvalues must be real - isn't that correct? If we apply the condition [tex]\lambda = -m^2[/tex], we get the eigenvalues 0, 1, 4, 9,... since the periodicity implies that [tex]m = 0, \pm1, \pm2,...[/tex] Right?
Yeah, I overlooked the Hermiticity.

The eigenvalues are nonnegative as you said, so you get 0,-1,-4 etc.
 
  • #13
Thank you, Galileo. And the rest of you too :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K