Register to reply

Why can't optical phonons travel far?

by joelio36
Tags: optical, phonons, travel
Share this thread:
joelio36
#1
Jan31-13, 11:39 AM
P: 22
I can't figure this out/find the answer. Why are acoustic phonons very low loss (i.e. earthquake P and S waves), but optical phonons die out rapidly?

Thanks,
Joel
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Organic photovoltaic cells of the future: Charge formation efficiency used to screen materials
Promising ferroelectric materials suffer from unexpected electric polarizations
Structure of certain types of beetle shells could inspire brighter, whiter coatings and materials
Simon Bridge
#2
Jan31-13, 08:55 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 12,778
What mechanisms have you considered?
In what sense are phonons "low loss"? What does that mean exactly?
tthtlc
#3
Feb2-13, 06:59 AM
P: 4
The energy loss is low is because of the low frequency/longer wavelength phonon - which does not coincide with the size of the molecules/atoms. The higher frequencies/shorter wavelength phonon is likely to coincide with the size of the molecules/atoms, and thus losing its energy through resonating the energy through all the molecules/atoms. This is the cause of energy attenuation.

Another factor is energy dissipation: By having the size of molecules/atoms coinciding close to that of the phonon, the phonon streams is more likely to be reflected/refracted and thus dissipated.

Both of these factors can help to explain why longer wavelength can travel far, low signal loss.

Another possible explanation is the phonon density: higher frequencies phonon matches with that of smaller atoms/molecular structures, which occurred at a higher density/number, and thus is able to spread the energy faster. Lower frequencies/longer wavelength need larger molecular structures (or multiple atom forming a macro-structures), which occur at a much lower densities, and thus is less able to spread the energy faster.

Another possible dissipative phenomena is electron-phonon coupling, which is more likely to happen for higher frequencies phonons.

These are my layman's perspective of what's happening, but from a specialist point of view (beyond me), u can refer to:

http://www.iop.vast.ac.vn/theor/conf...roc/35/153.pdf (on resonance)

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/chemistry...23_562ln08.pdf (which correlate the wavelength of the phonon with the size of the molecule/atom)

and

http://www-ee.eng.buffalo.edu/facult...Papers/115.pdf (on electron-phonon coupling)

http://www.iue.tuwien.ac.at/phd/smirnov/node53.html

http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/meso/ssscript/phononen.pdf

http://ndl.ee.ucr.edu/Paris-Lecture-05.pdf


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Optical phonons Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Excitation of optical branch phonons Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1
Optical and Acoustic Phonons? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Polar coupling between electrons and optical phonons Quantum Physics 0
Optical Phonons and Monatomic Model Advanced Physics Homework 4