Why can't optical phonons travel far?


by joelio36
Tags: optical, phonons, travel
joelio36
joelio36 is offline
#1
Jan31-13, 11:39 AM
P: 21
I can't figure this out/find the answer. Why are acoustic phonons very low loss (i.e. earthquake P and S waves), but optical phonons die out rapidly?

Thanks,
Joel
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy
After 13 years, progress in pitch-drop experiment (w/ video)
Global scientific team 'visualizes' a new crystallization process (w/ video)
Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is online now
#2
Jan31-13, 08:55 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 10,942
What mechanisms have you considered?
In what sense are phonons "low loss"? What does that mean exactly?
tthtlc
tthtlc is offline
#3
Feb2-13, 06:59 AM
P: 4
The energy loss is low is because of the low frequency/longer wavelength phonon - which does not coincide with the size of the molecules/atoms. The higher frequencies/shorter wavelength phonon is likely to coincide with the size of the molecules/atoms, and thus losing its energy through resonating the energy through all the molecules/atoms. This is the cause of energy attenuation.

Another factor is energy dissipation: By having the size of molecules/atoms coinciding close to that of the phonon, the phonon streams is more likely to be reflected/refracted and thus dissipated.

Both of these factors can help to explain why longer wavelength can travel far, low signal loss.

Another possible explanation is the phonon density: higher frequencies phonon matches with that of smaller atoms/molecular structures, which occurred at a higher density/number, and thus is able to spread the energy faster. Lower frequencies/longer wavelength need larger molecular structures (or multiple atom forming a macro-structures), which occur at a much lower densities, and thus is less able to spread the energy faster.

Another possible dissipative phenomena is electron-phonon coupling, which is more likely to happen for higher frequencies phonons.

These are my layman's perspective of what's happening, but from a specialist point of view (beyond me), u can refer to:

http://www.iop.vast.ac.vn/theor/conf...roc/35/153.pdf (on resonance)

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/chemistry...23_562ln08.pdf (which correlate the wavelength of the phonon with the size of the molecule/atom)

and

http://www-ee.eng.buffalo.edu/facult...Papers/115.pdf (on electron-phonon coupling)

http://www.iue.tuwien.ac.at/phd/smirnov/node53.html

http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/meso/ssscript/phononen.pdf

http://ndl.ee.ucr.edu/Paris-Lecture-05.pdf


Register to reply

Related Discussions
optical phonons Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
excitation of optical branch phonons Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1
Optical and Acoustic Phonons? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
polar coupling between electrons and optical phonons Quantum Physics 0
Optical Phonons and Monatomic Model Advanced Physics Homework 4