Meter Stick


by Haftred
Tags: meter, stick
Haftred
Haftred is offline
#1
Mar31-05, 04:28 PM
P: 56
Can one read a meter stick down to a tenth of a millimeter? For example, could I reasonably measure an object as 32.43 cm using a meter stick?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Integral
Integral is offline
#2
Mar31-05, 04:33 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,291
.1 mm on meter stick is gotten from a fair guess. You need to combine that fair guess with multiple measurements to obtain a statistical basis then compute an average. Your result should state a estimate at the magnitude of your error, perhaps the standard deviation of your data.
whozum
whozum is offline
#3
Mar31-05, 07:58 PM
P: 2,223
As far as significant figures go, if it is marked down to milimeters, the best measurement you can get is 0.0001m, you are allowed to guess one decimal place beyond what you can measure, provided you show a realm of error in the same magnitude.

brewnog
brewnog is offline
#4
Apr1-05, 07:52 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
brewnog's Avatar
P: 2,793

Meter Stick


I've used metre sticks from which pretty precise readings could be taken, but the accuracy was really poor (perhaps 2mm out over the whole length).
SpaceTiger
SpaceTiger is offline
#5
Apr1-05, 08:17 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
SpaceTiger's Avatar
P: 2,977
Quote Quote by Haftred
Can one read a meter stick down to a tenth of a millimeter? For example, could I reasonably measure an object as 32.43 cm using a meter stick?
It's not clear to me that there's a rigorous justification for the standard error quote when using a meter stick, but it's also not clear that one is needed. If it's an accurate meter stick and you can resolve the markings with your eyes, then your measurement is certainly good to the millimeter level. Beyond that, determining the error is more of a psychological problem than anything else.
Haftred
Haftred is offline
#6
Apr1-05, 01:41 PM
P: 56
Quote Quote by whozum
you are allowed to guess one decimal place beyond what you can measure, provided you show a realm of error in the same magnitude.
Can you give a numerical example of this? Thanks.
whozum
whozum is offline
#7
Apr1-05, 03:08 PM
P: 2,223
On a meter stick, typically marking are up to milimeters.
1 millimeter = 10 ^ -3 m = 0.001 m

Lets say your measuring a pencil
You can measure the number of millimeters exactly without any error, right? Just count up the ticks. This value is exact, lets say its 0.104m, or 10.4cm. After that, you are permitted to estimate up to one decimal place more, for example, if its really close to the 4mm mark, you can guess it to be about 10.41cm, or 10.42cm, something like that. if its clsoe to the middle, 10.45. The point is you can put a reasonable estimate on this value. It is not reasonable however to say that a pencil is 10.42434395098cm just by looking off a ruler, because you can't obtain such a high accuracy. The most you can say is what you can observe as exact, plus one more decimal place.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Hanging Meter Stick Introductory Physics Homework 2
Falling Meter Stick Introductory Physics Homework 2
need help with meter stick problem General Physics 3
Meter Stick Introductory Physics Homework 2
Hanging Meter Stick Introductory Physics Homework 13