danne89
- 180
- 0
Hello! Anyone read Apostol's Calculus vol. 1. On p. 28 the exercises feels very hard. Can somebody help me with nr. 2?
The discussion revolves around an exercise from Apostol's Calculus Vol. 1, specifically Exercise 2 on page 28, which asks participants to prove that for any arbitrary real number x, there exist positive integers m and n such that m < x < n. The scope includes conceptual clarification and mathematical reasoning related to the exercise.
Participants express differing interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the necessity for m and n to be positive integers and the implications of x being 0. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the interpretation of the exercise.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of integers and the definitions of boundedness, which are not fully explored or resolved.
danne89 said:I thought it would be useless because the answer must build on his axioms...
But here it comes:
If x is an arbitrary real number, prove that there exist positive integers such as m<x<n.